On Tuesday’s Mark Levin Show, Jon Stewart is getting lots of attention because he’s disagreed with Stephen Colbert on the origins of the coronavirus, but Conservatives don’t need validation from the left. We embrace our ideas because they are solid, not because they are lauded by the left. A revolution is launched and won by the minority, not the majority of the population. The American Revolution, for example, was because the British governing system smothered liberty. The French Revolution was a cultural revolution to destroy and replace everything in their society, not just the governing system. Marxism is about power and centralized control of civil society. This is why conservatives must become, more aware, shrewder, and more engaged in the public discourse. Conservatives must take on the culture. Then, AG Merrick Garland is a radical dressed in judicial robes and now says that the greatest domestic threat to the US comes from White supremacists. If this is true, then President Biden and Garland’s rhetoric about people that are White paints 60% of the US population with a very broad brush lumping all White people with radical violent militia groups and neo-Nazi’s. Garland also lumped in anyone that took “overt steps based on beliefs that the United States has overstepped its Constitutional authority.” Later, Terry McAuliffe is downplaying critical race theory to delegitimize his critics. In a classic example of going on offense, the Nevada Family Alliance is considering a proposal to have teachers wear body cameras. Parents and taxpayers have every right to know what’s going on in these classrooms. Afterward, Zuhdi Jasser, President of the Islamic Forum for Democracy, joins the show and points out that the Democrats have given ‘the squad’ the green light to destroy the American economy in the name of a green new deal. Jasser added that Democrats are silent on anti-Semitism and human rights abuses in China and the Middle East just so that they could advance their anti-American political agenda. Jasser said that Islamists come to the Western world to proselytize in the name of jihad.
THIS IS FROM:
Right Scoop
Jon Stewart says COVID came from Wuhan lab, mocks theory it came from nature
PJ Media
Terry McAuliffe Says Concerns About CRT Are a ‘Right-Wing Conspiracy’
American Thinker
Mandatory body cameras for teachers, not just cops!
Rumble
Kamala: We Must Reimagine Economy, Not Just Repair It
Reason
More Sanctuary States of the Right
Rumble
SUPERCUT: Biden Is Always “In Trouble”
Breitbart
Republicans Introduce a Censure Resolution Condemning ‘Squad’ Members
Washington Examiner
141 House Republicans challenge ATF tax, registration of AR pistols
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Education Images
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
So I’m inundated today. With comments about Jon Stewart. Emails, texts all over the Internet, hey, did you hear what Jon Stewart had to say? No, not really. I don’t know. He was on Stephen Colbert’s show. I know it’s Coburn, I call him Coburn just to annoy the fool while he’s making the case that that the virus came from the Wuhan and Stephen Colbert doesn’t like it. And it’s really it’s really good. OK, got it. And I listened to it, it really was good. It was very good, hey, last week, did you hear what Bill Maher said? No, I didn’t hear what Bill Maher said. Oh, yeah. Was really good. What he said about going to college. It was really and it was really good. OK, very good. Now what? What does it mean? You know, Rush used to say he was so right on. Why do we need liberals or even leftists to validate our principles? Why do we get so excited? When one out of 100 or one out of a thousand times. They say something that we agree with. Maybe it’s because people are in love with Hollywood or television or the movie. I don’t know, to be perfectly honest with you. I was spending almost the entire day having to get a new car because my other car, as you know, was. Totalled. But this seems to be, you know, my email box at say, did you hear what he said? I don’t care what they said that is. It’s interesting in and of itself. And I’ve played George Carlin here on the environment. And I’ve played that not because George Carlin was a liberal, which he was, but because he made a lot of sense on the topic. He made a lot of sense. And it’s entertaining. But let’s let’s put this in some kind of context. Revolutions are not launched by the majority. I can’t think of one. The American Revolution historians estimate one third of the colonists supported it. One third were neutral and one third opposed the war that. Give or take. Revolutions are not a majoritarian exercise. Quite the contrary. Not a matter of winning over a majority of the people. No elections in certain circumstances usually, of course, not talking about elections. We’re talking about controlling institutions, controlling the narrative and. Launching and controlling revolutions. Revolutions are launched by a minority. Whether was Mao in China, Lenin in Russia, Castro and Cuba. And on and on and on. Hitler and Germany. These weren’t majority parties, let alone. A majority of the population. Now, eventually, the majority, most of the population was controlled by the minority. But Marxism isn’t about a majoritarian ideology. Fascism isn’t about a majoritarianism ideology, and yet that’s what we’re fighting in this country right now. That’s what we’re finding. We’re not going to win over. Everybody anything close to everybody? Police need to make a stand. For the one third or the 40 percent of the American people with whom we agree and who agree with us, we’re not even doing that. Which is my point. Now, let’s take a look at two revolutions. Amoretti boring everybody, Mr. Producer, I hope not. Let’s take a look at the American Revolution in the French Revolution, comparable period of time. Huge difference between the revolutions. The American Revolution wasn’t a revolution about the civil society or the culture. The American Revolution was about liberty and representative government. The American Revolution was about. A governing system, a political system. Because Britain. Was smothering. The colonies, the colonial governments and so forth, among other things. In America. Now, the French Revolution was utterly and completely different kind of revolution. It was a cultural revolution, it was a revolution against the civil society is a revolution to turn everything inside out and upside down. To destroy what had been. And to replace it. And it was a brutally. Vicious and bloody revolution. Really a precursor to a Marxist revolution, if you will. But it was about settling scores, it was about imposing, quote unquote, values and principles. It was based mostly on Russo, who we’ve talked about here many times, that’s not the case with the American Revolution. Neither revolution involved a majority of the population. And in terms of supporting the revolution, but one of the revolutions was focused more on the governing system and freedom, the other revolution was focused almost exclusively on not only taking out the monarchy, but destroying everything that came before. A clean slate. As Rousseau would say. So situations involve different kinds of reactions. Now, what’s Marxism? What is Marxism about? It’s about governing systems, is it about the civil society, the culture, politic? What is Marxism about? Marxism is about. Control and power. Centralized, destroying individual initiative and everything that comes with that, the nature of man. There’s no clear distinction in Marxism between the civil society and politics. They’re all fused together, if you read enough of Marx’s writings, including the Communist Manifesto. And yet when Mao picked it up, he had, what, a cultural revolution? But Lennon didn’t have a cultural revolution. He had more of a governing revolution. They are making a point a second. Maybe I’m an outlier. It’s possible. Based on all these emails and information I was getting today, like, geez, what’s going on out there? A couple of comedians, I don’t know. You don’t understand, Mark. You don’t understand. I don’t understand, I guess. The problem, ladies and gentlemen, isn’t one of definition, in my view. The problem is one of control. We go all the way back to liberty and tyranny. All the way back to liberty and tyranny. A conservative manifesto. Page 195. The conservative must become more engaged in public matters. It is in his nature to live and let live, to attend to his family, to volunteer time with his church and synagogue, and to quietly assist a friend, a neighbor or even a stranger. These are certainly admirable qualities that contribute to the overall health of the community. But it’s no longer enough. The statists counterrevolution has turned the instrumentalities of public affairs and public governance against the civil society. The status counterrevolution has turned the instrumentalities of public affairs and public governance against the civil society. They can no longer be left to the devices of the status, which is largely the case today. OK, so what do we do about. Back then, 12 and a half years ago, this will require a new generation of conservative activists, larger in numbers, shrewder, more articulate than before, who seek to blunt the statist counterrevolution, not imitate it. And gradually and steadily reverse course, more conservatives than before will need to seek elective and appointed office for the ranks of the administrative state, hold teaching positions in public schools and universities, and find positions in Hollywood, in the media where they can make a difference in infinite ways. So in other words. We. Those who believe in liberty and this country. We need to secrete ourselves in various levels of government, various levels of society, various levels of the culture. Which we’ve abandoned. The status does not have a birthright ownership to these institutions. The conservative must fight for them, mold them where appropriate, eliminate them, or they’re destructive to the preservation improvement of the civil society. And I go on to where we need to educate our children and our grandchildren, where an army of tens of millions. We have more access to our children than the public school systems. And what else, education? Is education a matter of civil society, politics, culture? It doesn’t matter. It underplays everything. And education should not stop at the front door, I pointed out we the people are vast army of educators and communicators. So when the occasion arises and conversations with neighbors, friends and co-workers and others take the time to explain conservative principles and their value to the individual family and society generally. Conservatives should not ignore the media, Hollywood government, schools and universities. That they should not be the primary sources of information that shape the conservative worldview, and I go on and on. So where are we? What does all this mean? Now, what’s interesting to me. As we talk about your typical liberals, people want to talk about Mars, they want to talk about Stewart based on the emails I’ve gotten. Are not liberals of this ilk and not just them, whether in Hollywood. Whether the Democrat Party, whether in the media, whether in our governing systems, are they not largely responsible for where we are today? That is, have they not helped pave the path? To Marxism in this country. 45 percent of the Democrat primary voters when Hillary Clinton was running voted for Bernie Sanders for president as the nominee of the Democrat Party. 45 percent. Most of them wouldn’t view themselves personally as Marxists, just as liberals. So it is the liberal, the old time liberal woman who may now from time to time be repulsed by these American Marxists and their extremism, who laid the groundwork for American Marxism. And they’re doing it today, if you look at the halls of Congress, Schumer. With Bernie Sanders and others, Pelosi. Omar and AOC and Talib and so forth. We cannot expect. We cannot expect. These individuals, wherever they are, whatever their walk of life. To help. Quell what they’ve helped to create. So what is it about activism we have got to get into these institutions, as I wrote years ago. We have got to become the teachers, the producers, the directors. We have got to find ways. To get involved. And governance and society and culture. That we have been very timid about in the past. But that’s just the beginning. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
When you sit down to write a book, if they have a reason, don’t you, and the public is smart, you’re smart, you know, if somebody is writing a book just to promote themselves or promote whatever. I sat down, I was saying we need to better understand the enemy here, we better start using the right language, understand where the enemy comes from. Because any military operation, let alone a political operation, you cannot defeat the enemy unless you know the enemy. I’ve talked about this now for two and a half months. For two and a half months. That is the purpose of this book and then. To explain what we must do about this, in my view, and then we will elicit many ideas, we’re going to make this a partnership, but still the end has multiple ideas. I can’t rely on Jon Stewart and Bill Maher or the next one who pops up. I have no problem with it. I’m glad they’re talking. They’re entertaining. They’re interesting. But that’s not going to fix a damn thing, we have to do it ourselves. We do. And there’s enough of us. And you can already see it starting. There’s tens of millions of us. And if we want to influence people, influence our children and grandchildren, influence our co-workers, influence our colleagues, influence our neighbors, there’s many people out there who we can influence, who are open to our debate, open to our discussion. But we haven’t talked to them. They’re sitting on the fence. But we’re not going to be able to influence Marxists. They must be defeated. They must be crushed. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 3
So you won’t find any conservatives celebrated by the left, whether it’s the liberal left or the Marxist left or any of the left. Not one. Because they are self-righteous, they are focused, their ideological, and they are on the move. As I said. If we can talk to each other, influence our family members, our friends, our neighbors, our colleagues, our co-workers. We have an army of tens of millions. They don’t have a majority. We may not get a majority. It’s OK. We didn’t have a majority during the American Revolution. It’s OK. But we have to make sure that we. Who do understand what’s taking place? That we do what we can do. That’s the whole point of American Marxism. It’s enough is enough. Let’s stop pretending these people are, quote unquote, liberals or quote unquote, democratic socialists or quote unquote community activists or quote unquote, social activist. We must not allow them to define themselves and to define us. Certainly not among us ourselves. So who are these people, what are their backgrounds? Who are they learning from? And then we need to unravel it, untangle it. Confront it and defeat it. It’s no simple task, but you have to begin somewhere, and I think that’s why this book, American Marxism and the Preorders, is so. Significant right now. Because you’re chomping at the bit. And I’m chomping at the bit to engage you in this. And that’s what we’re going to do. Merrick Garland, I told you, Merrick Garland the other day is truly a radical. He was dressed in judicial robes and now he’s out of the closet. And I want to listen, I want you to listen to what he had to say today. And let’s let’s analyze this, it’s very important. At the Department of Justice, cut one go, our intelligence and law enforcement agencies undertook that assessment in the first several weeks of this administration. In March, they concluded that domestic violent extremists pose an elevated threat to the homeland in twenty, twenty one. Our experience on the ground confirms this. The number of open FBI domestic terrorism investigations this year has increased significantly. According to an unclassified summary of the March intelligence assessment, the two most lethal elements of the domestic violence and extremist threat are racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists and militia violent extremists. In the FBI’s view, that top domestic violent extremist threat comes from racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists, specifically those who advocated for the superiority of the white race. Now, let’s let’s break this down. Let’s break this down, and I’ve told you this before, may surprise some of you that the greatest threats that I’ve received, my safety is from. White supremacists, neo-Nazis, because I’m Jewish. But I can’t project that onto the entire society and I don’t. If this is true. If we’re Garland in, the FBI are saying is true, that the greatest domestic threat that we face is from. Those who advocate for the superiority of the white race. Then I have a question I want to pose. Does that not underscore and provide exclamation marks behind the utter and complete irresponsibility of Joe Biden and Merrick Garland and all the rest of talking about a white supremacist society, a white dominated society, as if all white people are advocating for the superiority of the white race? Does it not make it more crucial and essential that when Joe Biden and Merrick Garland and the others are speaking, that they’re very clear about who they’re identifying? So there’s no ambiguity whatsoever. If it’s the Klan and the neo-Nazis and white militia groups, then say so, but you don’t talk about over 60 percent of the American population in the same terms that you talk about, neo-Nazis, Klansmen. And militia groups, do you? So this demonstrates in a big way how outrageous it is. To trash people based on their race. Tens of millions of people. Well, more than that, I mean, it’s almost 200 million people. Unbelievable, particularly that he says this. What he should be saying is we’re not talking about. Caucasians, generally, we’re talking about these groups and be very specific, but they’re not. So they mix politics with law enforcement. And then they project these these nut jobs, these potentially violent nut jobs. Who advocate for the superiority of the white race onto the entire white population. That’s number one. Number two, it is a very carefully read statement. It’s not to the very end that he mentions that it’s specifically those who advocated for the superiority of the white race. Are there other militia, potentially violent terrorists, domestic groups? Who are demanding and are prepared to undertake violent actions. Based on race, the answer is yes, but he doesn’t tell us about that. We know the answer is yes because we saw it all summer long. What Black Lives Matter. Cut to go. The March assessment concluded that the militia violent extremist threat, which describes as those who, quote, take overt steps to violently resist or facilitate the overthrow of the United States government in support of their belief that the United States government is reportedly exceeding its constitutional authority, also increased last year and will almost certainly, certainly continue to be elevated throughout 2021. Well, let’s stop there. Take. Those who, quote, take overt steps to violently resist or overthrow the United States government. In support of their belief that the United States government is purportedly exceeding its constitutional authority. Wouldn’t that include Marxist organizations? Who don’t even care about the constitutional authority they just want to overthrow. Wouldn’t that include the ideology that we’ve been talking about, critical race theory and other critical theories, not just critical race theory? Who insists on overthrowing our government, who are promoting Marxism from the classrooms and beyond, what you’re going to see when you read American Marxism is we have professors specifically. Who indoctrinating kids on violently overthrowing the United States government, they are tenured there on the public payroll. They are, quote unquote, scholars. They are celebrated and you’re going to meet some of them. Do they count to. Do they count to. Now, this certainly isn’t a defense of these white racists. But it is shocking to me that the Democrat Party uses this propaganda and this race attack. On 60 percent of the American people. Over 60 percent of the American people who are white. Throw them all in the same barrel. Go ahead. Particularly concerning is the March assessment’s observation that the threat from lone offenders or small cells poses significant detection and disruption challenges because of those actors capacity for independent radical radicalization to violence, ability to mobilize discreetly and access to firearms. The domestic violent extremist threat is also rapidly evolving. You see, in part of the problem is the complete lack of trust I and others have for a man like this and this administration based on their outrageous racist rhetoric. And when they when they talk about Republicans, when they talk about mostly peaceful protesters, when they talk about Trump supporters and try and link them all together. And then they try and attack the Second Amendment, they’re trying to attack it by. Cobbling together potential litigation against manufacturers of weapons and ammunition. They want to increase massively taxes on weapons to make it impossible for average citizens, particularly poor citizens, to have access to weapons, their constant war on the Second Amendment. And so in many ways, they’ve lost the faith of tens of millions of the American people who listen to this. Cut. Cut three, please go. We are focused on violence, not on ideology. In America, espousing a hateful ideology is not unlawful. We do not investigate individuals for their First Amendment amendment protected. But yes, you do. Why are you like. You go on the Internet, you look at Facebook, you look at Twitter, you look at Parler, you look at anything you could get your hands on. Yes, you do, and many of these gun control laws that you’re promoting. I create these prerequisites. For people who say certain things are right, certain things, and by the way, that’s not 100 percent out of bounds under certain conditions either. But you do not investigate individuals for their First Amendment protected activities. Surely you do. But there are certain individuals who investigate and certain individuals who don’t investigate. Why did a whole Sunday show on January 6th and the other events that took place and in the summer of twenty twenty? The disparate treatment of American citizens. And that’s why I specifically stated on that program on Fox. If there were. White supremacists. Such as Klansmen, neo-Nazis and so forth. Who were in that building on January 6th. Then tell us who they were. What’s the secret, all trials are supposed to be public. All charges are supposed to be public. We don’t have star chambers in this country and this judge should know it. So who are they? Instead, they they bring in the entire. Hundreds and hundreds of thousands of protesters. They ran an entire race of people. Where the specifics. I’m sure they have them, why don’t they present them? I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
Terry McAuliffe, Terry McAuliffe won the governorship last time by a hair because the Republican National Committee refused to give the kind of support it should have to Ken Cuccinelli. Who would have been the governor if they bother to lift a finger, but instead they were over there helping? Helping? What’s his name? Christie, the Cape Cod orca. Well, he’s not the Cape Cod. The Cape, New York. May I say respectfully. Although he has said some good things lately, maybe ought to stop that, maybe I to watch him for a while. What do you think, Mr. Producer. All right, I’ll hold off for a while, Terry McAuliffe says concerns about critical race theory are a right wing conspiracy theory, ladies and gentlemen, because he’s one of the stupidest human beings to crawl on the face of the earth, PJ Media points out. The Virginia Democrat nominee for governor, by the way, was already governor, governor, who was lousy. He doesn’t think much of the critical race theory, criticism, fact. He thinks it’s a right wing conspiracy. All you parents out there. Terry McAuliffe has no problem with critical race theory. Now, this is amazing, since he’s a white man. A white man who didn’t want a black person to win the Democratic primary to run for governor. Fox News obtained audio that revealed McCullough’s fear of the issue, doing damage to his chances of winning by trying to dismiss criticism of critical race theory as a conspiracy theory, he’s trying to delegitimize his critics while downplaying the significance of critical race theory, delegitimizing his critics so the parents and taxpayers of Virginia need to understand something. This man is going to support critical race theory. He’s going to support the indoctrination of your children into an openly racist ideology. He’s going to destroy your classrooms. And he wants to be your governor. A woman had asked him at a June four event, I was just wondering, with all the Republicans talking about critical race theory and they’re making this huge deal about it, it’s all the conversation in the news in Virginia. What are you going to say to all these people making education about that? That’s another right wing conspiracy. This is totally made up by Donald Trump and Glenn Junkin. This is who they are. It’s a conspiracy theory. What a dumb ass. This Terry McAuliffe conspiracy theory. Invite this jerk on my program. We, Mr. Producer, we are the biggest radio station in the state of Virginia. Come on the program, tough guy. Let’s have a discussion about classrooms, teachers, little kids and critical race theory. Yeah, right.