July 21st, 2025

July 21st, 2025

On Monday’s Mark Levin Show, what’s going on in Syria is the ethnic cleansing and slaughter of the Druze and Christians by groups like ISIS, now operating under different names within the Syrian regime. Israel is the only county to help protect the Druze and Tom Barrack, an envoy to Syria, Turkey, and Lebanon, is a disaster for condemning Israel’s defensive actions as complicating the situation. Barrack’s stance motivates terrorists, and he needs to be fired. Zuhdi Jasser calls in to explain that the Islamist regime in Syria and its alliances with Iran and Hezbollah have fueled sectarian violence, targeting these minority groups. There needs to be greater attention to the suffering of Christians and Druze under Syria’s government. Also, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified documents which revealed that Obama administration officials fabricated the Russia collusion narrative to undermine President Trump after his 2016 election win. These revelations confirm, again, that Mark Levin was right in 2017 when he first broke this news. Levin’s March 3, 2017 broadcast was the key to everything, that all of the Obama government was being used against Trump. Later, USAID, the State Department and other federal agencies under the Biden administration let more than $900 million in taxpayer funds go to opposing PM Benjamin Netanyahu and to support terror groups. This is why trump got rid of USAID – it was a left-wing bank.

Fox News
Don’t look away as Islamist regime in Syria allows slaughter of ​​Christians and Druze

Breitbart
Tulsi Gabbard’s Revelations Vindicate Mark Levin, Breitbart News, Trump

Breitbart
DNI Gabbard: Obama Directed a ‘Treasonous Conspiracy’ Against Trump

AP
US envoy doubles down on support for Syria’s government and criticizes Israel’s intervention

NY Post
Off-duty CBP officer shot in face during robbery at NYC park by suspect ID’d as illegal migrant, career criminal – who got freed after every bust

JNS
Biden admin let $900m in federal funds go to terror, anti-Netanyahu protests, House panel says

Fox News
AOC slams progressive critics for ‘lying’ about her Iron Dome stance in defense bill fight

Photo by ABDULAZIZ KETAZ/AFP

The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.

Rough transcription of Hour 1

Segment 1
Hello, America. Mark Levin here. Our number 877-381-3811.  877-381-3811. Hope you had a good weekend. Man. Oh, Manischewitz. Lots going on out there, America. And we will get into all of it. We’re going to have two special guests during this program. We’re going to have Matt Taibbi, who’s going to walk us through what Tulsi Gabbard found as the director of national intelligence. That’s next hour in an hour three, Zuhdi Jasser. We’re going to talk about what’s going on in Syria and the fact that we have an individual who’s an envoy to Syria, Turkey and Lebanon. Guy by the name of Tom Barrack or Barrack. Who am I view as a disaster. In my view, he should be fired. A complete disaster. And I’ll get to that later. You’ve never heard of them. And I will explain why he’s a disaster. And part of it has to do with the fact that I got a video about 90 minutes ago. And I opened this video and I shouldn’t open it because it’s very upsetting. And I’m not going to tell you who gave it to me. And it was a video of a Syrian terrorist who I believe was part of the Syrian army. This cover face is face cover. It is surrounded with other and this individual was surrounded by others of his sort. Fairly young man thrown to the ground. And while he was alive, they carved out his heart. It is now an image that I can never erase from my mind. Just a civilian who they grabbed. And this guy cut out his heart, pulled it out of his chest and held it up for everybody to see. Now the other day, the Israelis. Who have a significant Druze populate Druze or Arab Christians. That’s what they are. They’ve been around thousands of years. And the Syrian army and the Bedouins and others. ISIS is still there in some form under a different name, are trying to ethnically cleanse the Jews, eliminate them. The video that is out there about how they’re slaughtering people in hospitals, doctors. And so it’s just it’s it’s hard to stomach. So the Israelis have come to their defense. The Israelis have a significant Jewish population on the border with Syria. Around the Golan Heights. Some 700,000, give or take. And they’ve been asked by the Druze community to please help. There’s not another country in the face of the earth that’s helping none. And so the Israelis have been helping their air force has gone in there. They have warned the Syrians. This regime is led by a former ISIS leader. Who worked with Al Qaida. Who has said that he’s now reformed and is now backed by a number of Arab countries, including Qatar and Saudi Arabia and the UAE. But the Syrian army is involved in these slaughters. And so people are saying, What the hell’s going on here? I thought we lifted all the sanctions. So I’m getting into it now. Obviously, we lifted all the sanctions to give them a shot at the request of the Saudis. And the Qataris. And so the Israelis have come to the defense of these people. Nobody else has. And there was some kind of an arrangement that had been made with the Syrians would pull back and they’d pull back these terrorists. But that’s been broken. And so we’ve been envoy. I don’t know who this guy is, but Zuhdi Jasser does, and we’ll get into this in our three. His name is Tom Barrack. Are barrack b. A. R. C. K. I don’t know this for a fact, but I believe he’s one of the great leakers that we have. And there’s two others who I think I know who they are, too. But if I’m wrong, so be it. It’s just a surmise on my part, given the nature of the leaks to Axios and given what’s what’s said substantively. But he’s not the only one. And if he’s not the one, so be it. But it really doesn’t matter, does it? Because he went on the record with the Associated Press. And you know who he condemned, Mr. Producer? The Israelis. The Israelis are making it more, quote unquote, complicated. Because they’re defending the Jews who are being slaughtered. In a genocidal ethnic. Attack, war, terrorist invasion, whatever you want to call it, trying to wipe them out and in the most horrendous ways, going into their hospitals and slaughtering their doctors and their nurses and the patients kidnapping the babies. They have video of it online. These are animals. Just like the animals who attacked the the Israelis on October 7th. Same mindset. These are people that come out of the ice. You know, terrorist mindset. Now they have different names. Now they’re part of the Syrian government. So people are wondering what exactly is going on here. In the head of Syria is an east or was an ISIS mass murder torture? And what does he say while the Jews started it? The Jews don’t have enough people. They don’t have enough weapons. They don’t have anything to start anything. He’s a liar. He’s a terrorist. But my focus is on this guy or barrack. Tom Barrack. The idea that the one countries that is stepping in to try and protect these people. He’s making the situation, quote unquote, complicated is sickening. And if you saw what I saw on this video, if you saw what I saw on this video. Carving out a heart in another person’s chest. And this poor guy, he was thin. I mean, there was nothing to him. And they grab them and they do it. And what they’re doing to people, they’re. And for our envoy to talk about how matters are being complicated because the Israelis are trying to defend these people and help these people. How sick is that? His ass should be fired. In my humble opinion, I don’t know who he is. I don’t know his connection. I don’t know anything about him. I don’t need to. Sick. And of course, the Syrians and the ISIS wannabes, they hear this guy. Criticizing the one country that’s trying to defend the Druze, the Christian Arabs. And what do they take from it? Motivation. That’s what they take from it. Motivation. Sick. Sick. I won’t even post this ad So grotesque. I won’t post it. It did take my word for it. Tulsi Gabbard has released information. That is stunningly. Unbelievable. Now it’s believable in the sense that we kind of knew this, but this. Connects all the dots. And we’re going to have Matt Taibbi on. It’s quite good. In our to the editor of Racquet News to discuss this with us. When we come back, I want to remind you of something. I want to remind you of something that is very important, that this information’s coming out very important. Some people are dismissing it, Democrats, couple of legal analysts. But of course, we don’t care if they dismiss it or not, We think for ourselves here. That Obama was, in fact, behind this. But the senior ranks of the Obama regime knew exactly what it was doing. It was trying to take out Donald Trump from the get go. Yours truly told you this from the get go, but we’re going to get into this a little bit now, more with maybe an hour or two. But I still want to get into this. When we return. We’ll be right back.

Segment 2
Act now folks. I knew this was coming. I told you. Amazon has lowered the price of On Power. My new book, which comes out next Tuesday. Those of you who’ve already purchased pre-ordered from Amazon, you will get the new lower discount when they even things out. And as they lower it more, you will get even a lower discount. I guess it’s a higher discount, lower price for the book. And so they’ve lowered it by 27%. So the book is $27 retail, but you can now get it for $19.58. And I want to strongly encourage you to jump in now while you can get it at the lower price. Again, it’s under $20. Seriously, that’s a pretty darn good value at Amazon.com. And I want to remind you, we’re going to have a whole rollout starting on Friday. And we’re going to have wonderful three wonderful events at the Reagan Library and also Saturday, August 2nd. 1 p.m. are books and greetings. Located in Northfield Square, Northville, New Jersey. You don’t want to miss that. And then next Saturday, August 9th at 10 a.m., these are all Eastern time. Barnes and Noble, a brand new Barnes and Noble, The Spectrum at Reston Town Center in Reston, Virginia. We have these on our sites. You want to check them out? We love to see you. We’d love to have you. Those of you who think you’re not going to be there, you really ought to jump in and preorder now. The preorders are really doing exceptionally well right now, and that’s why they’ve lowered the the price and increase the discount. That’s what they do. Like Amazon’s about moving books and Amazon is about quantity. That’s what they’re about quantity. Move it, move it, move it. Moving. And the more books you move, they lower the price. So it even moves more. They try and take advantage of a hot spot. And that’s what I’m encouraging you to do. And your price may even go lower. You never know. So let me read you this piece. And again, in about an hour, we’re going to have Matt Taibbi here. He will explain in detail the the documents that were released by Tulsi Gabbard. But this is from our buddy Joel Pollak. And at Breitbart, one of the great sites. It really is. It’s just a fantastic. Alex Marlow has done a fantastic job there. Friday’s revelations by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard that outgoing Obama administration officials created the Russia collusion hoax, vindicated early reporting by broadcaster Mark Levine and Breitbart News. Now, we’ve been vindicated about 4 billion times, but this is very important. These are actual documents out of the government. On Friday, the office of the Director of National Intelligence released documents showing, quote, overwhelming evidence that demonstrates how after President Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, President Obama and his national security cabinet members manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years long coup against President Trump. Exactly what I told you folks here in early March 2017. Over eight years ago. The new allegation that emerges from the documents is that senior Obama officials defied existing intel assessments that suggested Russia had not interfered meaningfully in the 2016 election and prepared new assessments to suggest that it had done so, quote, based on information that was known by those involved to be manufactured. That is the Steele dossier or deemed as not credible, said the Office of the Director of National Intel in this statement on Friday. The revelations add weight to the hypothesis first proposed by Mark Levin on March three, 2017. Based on publicly available news reports that President Barack Obama had taken steps to undermine his successor. You remember that? I wasn’t after one exhibit after another. Breitbart News summarized Levin’s argument under the headline. Mark Levin to Congress Investigate Obama’s Silent Coup Versus Trump. Breitbart News reported. And kudos to Breitbart. They were there. They ran with the story and supported the effort. So the news story at the time they wrote. In summary, the Obama administration sought and eventually obtained authorization to eavesdrop on the Trump campaign. This is from many years ago. Continued monitoring the Trump team, even when no evidence of wrongdoing was found, then relaxed. The NSA rules to allow evidence to be shared widely within the government, virtually ensuring that the information, including the conversations of private citizens, would be leaked to the media. These were my conclusions has written up by Breitbart. Levin called the effort a silent coup by the Obama administration and demanded that it be investigated. In addition, Levin castigated Republicans in Congress for focusing their attention on Trump and Attorney General Sessions rather than Obama. Now, when President Trump referred to the allegations the next day that Obama had his wires tapped, quote unquote, the mainstream media, the source for Levin’s claims, claimed Trump was spouting a conspiracy theory. The Washington Post said that Trump was citing no evidence to support his explosive allegation. CNN ran a headline implicating Levin and Breitbart in a story by Brian Stelter. Quote, Birth of a Conspiracy Theory How Trump’s Wiretap Claim Got Started. The story has since apparently been pulled from CNN’s website, but the conspiracy turned out to be true. It was vindicated later in March 2017 by then Representative Devin Nunes, who revealed that members of the outgoing administration had unmasked Americans and intelligence wiretaps. And it goes on. You might want to read it. We’ve linked to it. I want to pursue this a little bit further, and then we will wait till hour two to talk to Matt Taibbi about the information that’s been revealed. But you remember that you were with me, America. March 3rd, 2017, right behind this desk. We exposed it and we didn’t even have access to government information.

Segment 3
It’s hilarious. And when I broke this story here by this microphone, I think it was a Thursday. And then. Sunday were on Fox and Friends Sunday and our friend Pete Hegseth interviewed me. And then Monday night, our buddy HANNITY interviewed me. The story went viral. The story was and I had one exhibit after another leaks to the media of what was taking place. And I concluded that Obama and his administration were trying to take out Donald Trump, that they had used the intelligence agencies and federal law enforcement, the FBI. They were planning stories. They were smearing the. The president. And it was a silent coup. And I urged Congress to investigate, starting with Obama and so forth and so on. Now, what’s odd is the media. Almost like a Chorus Line. And you know how they are. The Pravda, Al Jazeera, American media. They said I had no evidence. And yet, ladies and gentlemen, I was using their stories. They were writing stories about what was being leaked to them. And it just so happened as I was doing prep that Thursday and pulling together the stress of Wait a minute. And I saw a pattern. And then I went back and I started to get stories from six, eight weeks earlier and work from that point forward to the time of the broadcast in early March. And it became obvious to me that the leaks from me as a former Justice official, I could tell that the information had to be coming from the FBI and the CIA and other agencies. Because they had to deal with information that came out of these agencies. And I said so. And I started to put it together one piece after another. And I’ve played this for you I think three times over the years. I’m not going to play it again. Well, maybe later this week, maybe not. But the media started attacking me for concocting a conspiracy theory when I’m using their reported stories. The New York Times. A perfect example. The Washington Post. Perfect example. McClatchy. Other wire services. Other news platforms. There were no opinion pieces. No opinion at all. All these quote unquote, news reports. But the reaction was fierce. And I can count on three fingers people who came to my defense in this industry. Most of them were scared to death and they stood back the later as it was becoming obvious, at least more obvious, that I was right. There are jumping in front of the parade. This is what always happens. Like I said, they never said a damn thing. Not a damn thing. Let’s take a listen. Cut 21, go. White House officials say that the president’s sources were various conservative outlets, most prominently perhaps radio host Mark Levin, who seemed to take three basic chunks of information and combine them into one conspiracy theory of what he calls a silent coup. And on the conservative Breitbart website, which Friday highlighted a conspiracy loving radio talk show host Mark Levin. Now, the story asserted that Obama has been trying to undermine Trump at every turn. As you can see from the headline, it was inspired by a Thursday night radio segment by conservative talk show host Mark Levin. Apparently, this idea came from right wing radio host. Wait a minute. Who is that? Is that Stephen Colbert? The late Stephen Colbert. Isn’t it funny how I outlast all these guys? The guy from ABC is gone. Stelter is essentially gone. This guy Colbert is gone. Think about it. Go ahead. Ologist Mark Levin, who ranted about these wiretaps on his radio show. That show was then written up by Breitbart as Mark Levin to Congress investigate Obama’s silent coup versus Trump. What does the White House gain by the presidency, Not by Steve Bannon, most likely handing the president of the United States a car or a car they call. And and and talking about what a rabid right wing talk show host has been theorizing. Start with firebrand conservative radio host Mark Levin. Briefly, for people who don’t know, who is he? He’s got quite a following. And he’s not just a conservative figure, but often espousing relatively radical positions about the need to reinvent the Constitution and the government and the ways in which we think about society. The notion that Mark Levin is a news outlet, it’s just not The New York Times, it’s not The Washington Post, it’s not The Wall Street Journal, it’s not The L.A. Times. It’s not a major news network. Is Mark Levin a guy who I know and talk radio guys do. And left and right, most and right, they rob them, brown people up with outrageous charges and nobody keeps count of them. Here’s the president, United States getting his information from these people. Evidence for suggesting President Obama has committed a crime seems pretty thin. That detailed speculation from a conspiracy loving talk show host like Mark Levin. Okay. I think we can now officially declare that Trump has a worse media diet than the Son of Sam killer. And he got all his news from a talking dog who told him to murder. Hmm. And it went on. Funny, isn’t it? Funny, isn’t it? And that’s why this information. Not by the government itself. It’s been out there, but now it’s official. It’s certified, if you will. And really what we should have taken away from that March 3rd, 2017, and the response to it. By the very media outlets that wrote the stories. Is what was to come. Now, we didn’t know about the Hunter laptop, but it was treated the same way. As for other things, the 51 so-called spooks who signed a letter saying the Hunter laptop was a Russian plant. And they do this all the time, don’t they? But that was really the the pinnacle. That revealed to us, those of you who’ve been listening to this program, what was to come and what the media had become. Now, the media had always been very poor. Certainly during my lifetime. But it got worse and worse. And that was the pinnacle because Donald Trump wasn’t supposed to win in 2016, according to them. And so the fact that he did win, they did everything they could to take him out. And after after this phony Russia collusion thing, the two impeachments, criminal investigation, all these things they did to try and undermine his presidency and so forth. That March 3rd, 2017. Broadcast, which really ought to go down in the Hall of Fame if they even keep broadcast in the Hall of Fame. Was the key to everything. It was the key to the fact that all the instrumentalities of the federal government were being used against Donald Trump. And one of the things I pointed out excuse me that Joel Pollak points out in his piece today is something that nobody else was talking about, the Obama. Changed the distribution chain of intelligence to include far more departments. And agencies. Because he wanted the information to leak. And it did. Leaks were coming out of the Department of Justice at the FBI. Leaks were coming out of the intelligence agencies. The director of National Intelligence Office, an office of the CIA. This was a all hands or government effort. And then you might remember the meeting that Obama had in the Oval Office. And Biden was there and the acting attorney general was there and Comey was there and some of the others were there. I focused in heavily on that as the days went on. And it was a conspiracy to take out Donald Trump. And one day we’ll see the conspiracy with the White House, the Department of Justice. The FBI. Jack Smith. The DEA in Atlanta. The other days. The other U.S. attorneys, others. The D.A. in Manhattan to take out Donald Trump. All behind the scenes, all under the radar, and then they ask you to prove it. I had proven it. I use their articles. I use their stories. I could be wrong. I seem to remember there were 11 of them, Mr. Producer, that I highlighted. There could have been 25, but I highlighted 11 of them. This word wiretap. Which they eventually use to mock the president and me. Wiretap. We don’t use wiretaps anymore. The problem was it was in the headline of The New York Times story. And luckily, we kept it. I made a hard copy of everything I used just because they knew what sleaze balls I was dealing with. That’s what took place. So. Be very interesting to hear from Matt Taibbi in the second hour as he’s going through some of these documents or maybe most of them and. Keep something else in mind. I bet you they destroyed a lot, too. I bet you they did. And I’ll bet you they’ve destroyed a lot of information related to the prosecutions of Donald Trump this second go round. I bet they have. And I hope over. O.J. They’re looking to see if any of that occurred, because that would be a crime in and of itself. If they destroyed classified information or abused it. They’re not president of the United States who has independent constitutional authority. Anybody inferior to the president does not have that kind of authority. And also there’s the Presidential Records Act and so forth. I’ve got to believe that they didn’t keep everything in place. Don’t you think, Mr. Minister? I would think so too. I just don’t believe it. Yeah. So this was a massive scandal. It does make Watergate look like a joke or these other scandals look like a joke. So this was the first attempt to take out Trump in his first term. And then, of course, we have the second attempt to destroy him. As he was preparing to run for president a second time, was running a second time and was elected his second time. Many of the same forces, many of the same forces in the Biden regime trying to take out Donald Trump. That’s why I say. We need to step back, see the things this man has. Has done for this country. Look what he’s done in six months. It’s spectacular. Look what he’s gone through. These assassination attempts, these efforts by the federal government under the Democrats to destroy him. Nobody could withstand this. Nobody else could withstand this. Nobody. Nobody. And that’s why the Epstein stuff, it goes on and on and on. Although I notice it’s dying out, it’s starting to die out. It was going to die out anyway. Oh. Oh, he’s. He’s turned his back on mango. Oh, he stabbed us in a house. Shut up, you phony influencers, you de influencers, grifters, con men and women. I’ll be right back.

Segment 4
Have you heard this Special envoy this? Tom Barrack told the Associated Press Israel’s intervention in Syria creates another very confusing chapter. It came at a very bad time. I notice he doesn’t discuss what Israel was doing. What was his role doing? Special Envoy? Well, what’s Israel doing and why were they doing it? Now, this is pretty grotesque, ladies and gentlemen. Very grotesque. And I think the special envoy should be called before Congress. And members of Congress should ask the special envoy about his comments. He’s got quite a latitude there. Turkey, Lebanon and Syria doing a fantastic job. He’s engaged. I’m reading from AP and ceasefire efforts to halt sectarian violence in Syria that broke out last week and triggered an Israeli intervention on behalf of Syria’s minority Druze community. A cease fire was announced July 18. Now, as I go through this AP story, I don’t see chapter and verse about the about the genocide that’s taking place, the ethnic cleansing against the Druze. Why is that, AP? Why is that? Why didn’t you write that? And why hasn’t Mr. Barak, if he’s the special envoy, why isn’t he mention that he’s very concerned about the ethnic cleansing efforts against the Druze minority in Syria? How come he didn’t say anything or say anything? Very, you know, aggressively says the opposite. Now, if the Israelis hadn’t gone in there and tried to put an end to this, more and more of those Druse would have been slaughtered. So, I mean, seriously, folks. Seriously. Does anybody know this guy? Barack is Barack. Barack, Whatever. No, nobody’s ever heard of him. But I’m going to make them famous or infamous. You know, when you see genocide like this, it does help to speak out, especially when you’re the envoy. I’m sure the secretary of state, Rubio, must agree with me, although I haven’t heard from him. Sure he must write right, America. Maybe our vice president. Sure, he agrees with me, President, and then say, Yeah, sure. I mean, it seems to me we lifted sanctions on Syria. Should they at least respond by not slaughtering the Druze? It’s not just the Druze, their slow down Christians generally. Incredible. Incredible. The Druze minority in Israel is deeply respected for its service to the state. It’s really, like I said, there’s a significant population of Jews in Israel. It’s very interesting. They keep talking about apartheid in Israel. The Jews are Arab Christians. They hold all kinds of positions in the state of Israel. Other Arabs hold all kinds of positions in the state of Israel, as do people of all other faiths. All other faiths, including Arab Muslims. Netanyahu said the strikes were launched to prevent the militarization of Syrian forces on Israel’s northern border and to protect the brothers of our brothers, the Druze and the Druze mountain. So why are we condemning Syria? America. I mean, here’s Christians being slaughtered, right? Yeah. So I don’t know how you broker peace and broker ties and the interim Syrian government and so forth if they’re slaughtering people. This guy. Who runs series. He’s got past ties with al Qaeda and ISIS. In senior positions. And al Qaeda and ISIS. Seek to. Ethnically eliminate the Druze. Well, then why are they doing it? Yeah. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. This guy, Barack. Next thing you know, he’ll wind up on, you know, Qatar Olsson’s show. And that’s just my guess. I don’t know. I think that’s where all the envoys go, isn’t it, Mr. Producer? I won’t give him ideas. You’re right. That’s how fast our we got a big, big hour coming with Matt Taibbi. And we’re going to get into more of this this effort to take out Trump with the first term. We’ll be right back.