On Wednesday’s Mark Levin Show, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claims we have a right to work, a right to a free education, and guaranteed healthcare paid for by the state. These demands sound exactly from chapter ten of Stalin’s Soviet platform for “democracy.” Totalitarians like Joseph Stalin are role models to Marxists like Cortez and the Democrats. Her speech made no mention of liberty or individualism. Later, Barack Obama lies just like his Party and blames Trump for U.S. coronavirus deaths yet nine of the top ten states leading the death toll are led by blue-state Democrats. This must be clearly articulated by the Republicans at the RNC Convention next week! Afterward, an anonymous employee at Goodyear was told what they could and couldn’t wear; allowing Black Lives Matter, but rejecting Blue Lives Matter apparel. As this information was leaked, Goodyear tried to backtrack saying that they didn’t support political speech in the workplace. Despite the company’s support for BLM which is still political speech, it disallowed Blue Lives Matter which in much the same way is an equity issue like BLM supporting the lives and safety of law enforcement.
THIS IS FROM:
FDD
FAQ: The “Snapback” of UN Sanctions on Iran
Bucknell
1936 Constitution Of The USSR
Courier Journal
Trump knocks McConnell for Postal Service hearing ahead of Republican National Convention
Graiben
Supercut: Media/Dems Uncover … the Ultimate Conspiracy
Issues & Insights
The Dems’ Phony Election Mail ‘Crisis’ Is Over, But The Real One Remains
KATU
Second fire in a week at Portland Jewish center causes significant damage
Just The News
Democrats’ pandemic attacks ignore Trump’s 100-plus executive actions
UPI
Study: Black, White COVID-19 patients with access to care die at similar rates
Daily Wire
Media Fearmongering Has Led To Misconceptions About Risk Of Death From COVID-19
Daily Wire
Trump Calls For Goodyear Boycott Over Ban On MAGA Hats
Right Scoop
Kayleigh McEnany SCHOOLS reporter who DEFENDED Goodyear ban on Blue Lives Matter but not Black Lives Matter
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Brian Snyder
Rough transcript of 1st hour
Hour 1 Segment 1
Man, I have a whole program prepared here, but the president is speaking now and that could be interesting. He’s taking some questions. So you come first, audience. Let’s dip in briefly. Go ahead. But this was starting even four years ago when I came here, almost four years. Can you believe it? These are people that don’t like seeing what’s going on in places like Portland and places like QAnon Movement. I think that’s what it’s called. This is the problem with the media. What does this have to do with anybody? Anything? Do they ever ask Biden? Of course, they don’t get access to but they ever asked Biden about the anti Semite in his party. So they try and make the president look kooky and so forth and so on. It’s like I heard one commentator on cable today say AOC, her comments were exciting. This is a fairly moderate commentator, Republican, exciting. Have you ever heard them call a Tea Party person during the the height of the Tea Party movement 2010 when they spoke exciting. It’s just incredible. And then I’m thinking about and of course, I’m not watching this convention, which state and clips from here and there, I mean, to keep your sanity. I mean, I look at this lineup, there’s supposed to be four women and suburban women are supposed to love these guys. They have this guy, Carper. Who in the end nominates. One of the ones who nominated Biden. He’s confessed to hitting his ex-wife. And then, of course, you have. Clinton, who is accused. Of rape, and now he have these photos with an. With an EPSTEIN victim, and he’s still up there. And of course, Biden’s never had dance. You know, Trump, they’ve been all over Trump. Biden’s never had to answer for all of his the allegations about him and the fondling and all that. It’s just amazing to me how one party, one ideology is treated and how the other is treated. It’s amazing. All right. Back to the president action. The wall is now going to be next week, 300 miles long. Our numbers are extraordinary on the border. And this is through luck, perhaps more than talent, although the talent is getting it built when one party refuses to allow it. You don’t hear talk about the wall anymore. But I will say this. We need strength in our country, not weakness, too much weakness. Yes, you, Mr. President, you have been very bullish on the promise of convalescent plasma to treat Corona virus. The FDA appeared to be on the brink of issuing an emergency use authorization for convalescent plasma. But after hearing from top officials at the NIH that there wasn’t enough evidence to go ahead with that, the FDA has put that on pause. Your reaction to that? And do you believe that convalescent plasma should be in the arsenal of treatments? Well, I hear great things about it, John. That’s all I can tell you. And it could be a political decision because you have a lot of people over there that don’t want to rush things because they want to what they want to do it after November 3rd.And you’ve heard that one before. But I’ve heard fantastic things about convalescent plasma slower. And again, we have a the incredible politicization of science, not by the people who claim that you and I don’t follow the science. And the FDA is well known for dragging its feet. Fowler, she’s well known for dragging his feet. So here you have a pandemic. The best they can come up right now is wear a mask and stay at home and shut down the country. They’re still doing this. That’s the best. Go ahead. That’s very good. And we’ve approved certain things are 31percent and that’s OK, too. That’s some bad. And it’s really had a tremendous impact. But no, I have you tell me something right now that surprises me, but we’ll check it out right after this. Heard about it the way. I don’t want delays. I don’t want people dying. Yes, sir. I want to ask you about your tree earlier today on good year. It was essentially calling for a boycott for your tires. Do you want the federal government to stop buying and using your product? Well, it is to happen with Goodyear because what they are doing is playing politics. And the funny thing is the people that work for Goodyear, I can guarantee you a poll very well with all of those great workers in Goodyear. And when they say that you can’t have blue lives matter, you can’t show a blue line, you can’t wear a mega hat, but you can have other things that are Marxist in nature. There’s something wrong with the top of Goodyear. And what the radical left does is they make it impossible for people to do business if they’re Republican. I love it when the president talks like make the Marx effort, don’t shop there. They do vicious things not so different than what you saw on the streets of Portland two nights ago. Do you in Florida? That’s up to people. But I wouldn’t recommend it if they if they want to hold political speech, if they want to let you not do. Now, the words the president has had enough with these massive corporations that fund the left, that follow the left, that indoctrinate their workers. Same with these schools. And he’s pointing it out and he’s saying, look, this is what they’re doing. And if you don’t want to buy Goodyear tires, there’s other tires out there you can get to. He’s not attacking the employees. They’re the ownership. That is the the executives that run the company. They’re creating a political scenario. We’re sick of it. And the president saying enough is enough. We conservatives, we get to do this to them. Go ahead. You’ll be able to get another good jobs. I think it’s disgraceful that they did this. Please go ahead. Yes, Mr. President. You said the arrest of Jimmy Lai in Hong Kong is quite a terrible thing. Do you have a message for Kennedy? Why has your administration spending grappling with your State Department working for. Well, I send them best wishes. I hear he’s a wonderful gentleman. He’s certainly a brave man. And I send him best wishes with that being said, because of that and obviously what happened in Hong Kong. We’ve taken all of the vast amounts of money that we used to subsidize Hong Kong. We essentially subsidized Hong Kong by giving them all sorts of incentives. And that’s what made Hong Kong the exchange and business and Hong Kong successful. I’ve taken it all back. That means that the United States is going to do a lot more business. You know, we had we. We really gave them tremendous incentive and subsidy in order that they be successful for freedom. But now that the freedom obviously seems to have been taken away, we will keep all of the incentives that we were giving them, which is billions and billions of dollars. And all of that business will come into our country, including the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq, and it will come here. But I feel badly for him because I hear he’s a good person. I don’t know. But I here’s a good person, obviously a very brave person. Did you have something to say? Thank you, Mr. President. Prime Minister. I mean, you say Iraqi prime minister is coming in tomorrow to meet with you. And how do you feel about this notion that Iraq can once again become a buffer between Iranian influence and Russian influence in Middle East? Do you feel that under this prime minister, that’s possible. Once again, this is a man that I get along with very well. We’re largely out of Iraq. We’re down to a very few soldiers. I said we’re getting out of these endless wars, these ridiculous, endless wars. We should have never been there in the first place. I think it was the worst decision made in the history of our country. Should have never been there in the Middle East. We should have never been. But we’re getting out rapidly out of, you know, over the course of three years and getting out. It’s very sticky getting out. And some people agree and many people don’t agree. But I think most people very much agree. We’re doing very well in our negotiations with Afghanistan with getting out. We’re down to a much smaller number of people left there. And, you know, I greet the men and women coming home and coming home after they’ve been hit. I’ve also greeted many, many at Dover, greeted many bodies coming back in. And we’ve been there 19 years that we’re basically policemen. We’re acting as police as opposed to soldiers. And they’re going to have to police their own states. And they’ve been doing that for thousands of years. But it’s time after 19 years that our soldiers come home. They’ve done an incredible job. But, you know, they don’t they’re not allowed to fight, to win and. And maybe they shouldn’t be because a lot of the people it’s not their fault. But with the Taliban and withgoing to Iraq again, we’re down in Afghanistan, very low numbers and that’ll be taking place. And I let them know, do anything and you’ll be hit. Like you’ve never been hit before. So we’re we’re doing very well. Syria. The same thing. Remember when I took all of the soldiers off of the border between Syria and Turkey? Right. And everybody said, oh, this is that was two years ago, was a longtime ago. They said, oh, this is terrible, terrible, terrible. We’re going to leave. Why are we have our soldiers between Syria and Turkey? Turkey can definitely take care of itself. I have a very good relationship with President Erdogan and Syria has been fighting for ever. And I say, why are we guarding their border? And I brought our soldiers back home. I got them out. And guess what? Nothing’s happened. They’ve been fighting like they have been for a thousand years, OK? Nothing’s happened. And nobody mentions that. Everybody said this is going to be a disaster. There’s no disaster. Nothing’s happened. And so we’re getting out of the endless wars. And we are building a military, the likes of which the world has never seen. Two and a half trillion dollars was spent. And we hopefully don’t ever have to use it. But we want to focus on a much bigger picture because we have a much bigger picture. It’s when you look at what China is doing, when you look at what Russia is doing, when you look at what some other countries are doing, we want to be ready just in case there is a catastrophe. We don’t want to see that. We don’t want to ever use it. We’ve rebuilt our military. New missiles, new rockets and new tanks and new everything. New everything. Two and a half trillion all made in the USA. And we’ve upgraded incredibly our nuclear capability and some of our nuclear needed nourishment and data, new strength. And we’ve we’ve upgraded it very, very significantly. I mean, to a level that nobody would even believe. And hopefully we don’t. You pray to God we never have to use it. OK. But we’ve never been in a position where we’ve been this strong. Please. I wanted to ask you about the e-mail question. You mentioned that other countries are interested in following suit. Yes. Having to deal with UAE and Israel. Exactly. Is do you expect that Saudi Arabia will join and. Yes. And also, the Emirates have expressed interest in. Yes, 35. Do you think that should be something that they could look forward to in the future? Well, I think, look, they they’ve definitely got the money to pay for it. And it’s nice because usually when we have a lot of times we make deals, they have 10 cents. These countries we deal with. We give it to them. Like, how about paying us back later? But they never pay because they don’t have the money. No, they have the money. And they they would like to order quite a few F 35. It’s the greatest fighter jet in the world, as you know, by for stealth. Totally stealth. Can’t see it makes it very difficult. I was asking a pilot, what do you think is better? This one. This one, that one talking about Russian planes, Chinese planes. They said, well, the advantage we have is you can’t see it. So when we’re fighting, they can’t see us. I see. That sounds like a really big advantage to me, to these guys. They look, by the way, I said to these pilots that I meet, they look better than Tom Cruise and definitely tougher. And he’s a nice guy, but these these people are amazing and I speak to them a lot about it. What do you think? You know, as I go around to the various places I saved, the big one in Florida is a good example. That was a big one, knocked down pretty much by the hurricane. So I spent a lot of time on that. And it’s the greatest plane in the world. One thing about that kind of thing. Technology, high technology, greatest plane doesn’t last long. Somebody comes up with something else. But we’re always the ones that come up with something else. So, yeah, they’d like to buy at 35. We’ll see what happens. It’s under review, but they made a great a great advance in peace in the Middle East. Even The New York Times thought it was an incredible deal. Can you imagine that? All right. We’re going to take a little break here. We’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
Quickly, there was some breaking news here the president started with Iran and snap back. I’m like an expert in my family on this subject. My stepson David, who is brilliant when it comes to so many of these things. But I’m looking at the Richard Goldberg at the. That the Defense of Democracies. The term snapback is used to describe the process by which U.N. sanctions and restrictions may be reimposed on Iran. All of them. All of them would trigger the reimposition of all sanctions, restrictions on Iran, including an indefinite embargo on the transfer of conventional arms to and from Iran, an indefinite ban on international support for Iran’s missile program and outright prohibition on all testing and development of nuclear capable missiles, a demand to halt all enrichment related activities and indefinite travel and asset banned for sanctioned individuals. Now, who’s opposed to this? Virtually all of Europe. The Russians. And the Chinese. So this is a Security Council matter and I’m not going to get into the weeds right now. Perhaps I’ll bring on a couple of experts. Ambassador Dermer from Israel, maybe some others as well. Secretary of State. We’ll see others who are here, too. We’ll see. So that snapback is very, very important. President, the United States is really and correctly putting it to Iran. He’s really and correctly putting it to China, putting it to Russia while the Democrats run around and they’re talking about the post office. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 3
All right. I want to read something to you. This is from AOC speech and it comes out of the 110 page agenda. That they put together the Biden camp and the Sanders camp, which is really the Sanders camp. Some of the things they want to do. You have a right to work. They’re going to abolish unemployment. You have a right to a government job. You have the right excuse me to rest and leisure, I think AOC called it vacation. Give a right to rest and leisure. Want us to have a right to give a right to health care? Regardless of your circumstance, free medical service. That will be paid for by the state. You’ve a right to free education. That will be paid for by the state. They’ll be universal compulsory education. No private alternatives, no parochial alternatives, but it’ll all be paid for by the state. What else? Absolute equal rights in all spheres of the economy, government, the culture, society and political life. Equality of rights. Irrespective of nationality or race. Or stature or income status and so forth. What else? An absolute right to freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly can hold mass meetings. Freedom of the street processions and demonstrations. And these civil rights will be ensured they’ll be protected. What else? The right to have trade unions and cooperative associations. In all aspects of our lives, scientific societies where the science will actually be upheld. What else? No person shall be placed under arrest. Except by a definitive decision by a court. Citizens. We’ll be safe in their homes. The right to asylum. For all people who come into the country. The right to asylum. Actually, this comes from Chapter 10. Of Stalin’s Soviet Constitution 1936. Part 4. Chapter 10. What’s that sound like, Mr. Producer? Sounds like this. Ladies and gentlemen, here’s cut 5 of air at the Democratic convention last night. Go. Thank you to everyone here today, endeavoring towards a better, more just future for our country and our world. In fidelity and gratitude to a mass people’s movement working to establish21st century social, economic and human rights, including guaranteed healthcare, higher education, living wages and labor rights for all people in the United States. A movement striving to recognize and repair the wounds of racial injustice, colonization, misogyny and homophobia, and to propose and build reimagined systems of immigration and foreign policy that turn away from the violence and xenophobia of our past. A movement that realizes the unsustainable brutality of an economy that rewards explosive inequalities of wealth for the few at the expense of long term stability for the many. And who organized a historic grassroots campaign to reclaim our democracy in a time when millions of people in the United States are looking for deep, systemic solutions to our crises of mass evictions, unemployment and lack of health care. In a spirit to Pueblo and out of a love for all people, I hereby second the nomination of Senator Bernard Sanders of Vermont for president of the United States of America. While Bernard now something we might say, well, she seconded the nomination of Bernard. That’s in a ministerial task, given all the delegates that he received. He’s thrown into the process even though he loses. So that’s neither here nor there. And people have mentioned she never mentioned Joe Biden. Of course, that’s a fact. But that’s because they don’t care for Joe Biden. He’s a figurehead. He’s a funnel. But many of the things she’s talking about, the Soviet Union promised to and they always underwear underscored the word democracy. And the clowns that follow her and her clown colleagues, they’re Stalinists. It’s a more specific. Interpretation of her form of Marxism. She’s a Stalinist. Just because the immediate morons in the clown show, they call themselves newsrooms don’t get it. Some of them do get it, but most of them don’t get it. Doesn’t mean the rest of us have to be ignorant and illiterate. That’s exactly what this is. It’s a clown show. In our media, and so they think she’s very cool. That’s the future of the Democrat Party. I am telling you. That this is an iron fisted totalitarian ideology. These are people who are not from the private sector. These are people who are all about government. Oh, I understand she was a bartender once that. And I’m not putting down bartenders in the least. I’m just saying she’s never really produced anything. She’s never created anything. And yet she knows everything. And that’s the nature of the Marxist. Psych marks himself did almost nothing in the private sector, lived off his father’s money. His father was a lawyer. So they’re ideologues. They’re not realists. They don’t understand human nature. They don’t care what they do. There’s really two books if you really want to understand all this. There’s really two books, a mirror topiary. And rediscovering Americanism and the tyranny of progressivism that the two most complicated books that I’ve written for many people. But the two most important books to understand what’s going on today. Because. You will always have some form of inequality and they totalitarian, the Stalinist, the Marxist will always seize on it. Because you can never have perfect equality. Even in the rice fields of Cambodia under Pol Pot, where he killed, slaughtered 25 percent of his own people, they could never quite achieve equality, you know. Because human beings. Are beings. They’re not things. They’re not abstractions. They’re not theoretical. They have their own brains. Free will, motivations, interests. You notice when you’re speaking for ninety three or ninety six seconds is what she spoke for. You’re thinking of the most important points to get across to an audience. And so you have to whittle your thoughts down. The very precise. Very precise ideas and very concise language. Not once did she use the word liberty. Not once did she use the word individuality. Not once. Because she doesn’t believe in that. She believes in the state. The state. She’s no different than a 29 year old Fidel Castro. Who managed to takeover a Cuba? With a relative few guerrilla. Terrorists joining him. Less than 50. That’s why I keep banging the pots and pans about what’s going on in our streets. This is a minority, the population, a term, but a racial minority, the minority. Numbers wise of the population, but they have the capacity to overthrow the government. Hitler. The Nazis were a minority, the population they over. Through the government, they took over society. Lenin and the Communists. They took advantage of the turmoil and told what was going on in Russia under the Tsar. They were not the majority. But there were the best networks and the best organized. And he took over the country. In too many ways. Too many of our fellow citizens are sleep. They’re troubled by the rioting. But they buy the propaganda from the Patriot Guard media. The Praetorian Guard media. The Democrat Party media. Which is focused on taking out Trump and nothing else and nothing more. They will get behind riders, they’ll get behind anti fur, they’ll get behind Black Lives Matter. It does matter. It doesn’t matter. Anything that works, the ends justify the means. I read to you from Stalin’s 1936 Soviet Constitution. I could read more. But why bother? And then you listen to AOC and you heard the similarities because she is a follower of Bernie Sanders. And Bernie Sanders knows exactly what I read, if he would have heard it, which I’m sure he didn’t. From the Soviet Constitution of 1936, Bernie Sanders understands. Stalin, Lenin, Mao. Castro, all the communists. Better than he understands American history, because for him, he doesn’t have to understand American history. He just has to attack it. So when they talk about inequality, the greatest inequality you will find. Is it North Korea? Which is the most iron fisted policestate on the face of the Earth. And yet among the masses, quote unquote. There is a level of equality throughimpoverishment and starvation and brutality. Gulags and soforth. They claim their free education. Full employment. A right to leave here. They just never get around to producing it. Because they can’t because they take the levers of prosperity, the levers of freedom, the levers of humanity, and they break them. And they never take a step back. There’s no circumspection whatsoever. There will never be circumspection with an AOC with a Bernie Sanders. It’s just we need more perfection. You know how I know that because Marx talks about it, Marx despised Democratic socialists. Marx despite what he would call halfway communists. It’s all or nothing. All or nothing. That’s what you see in the streets in Portland and Seattle. You’ve seen it in New York, in Minneapolis, all or nothing. And you must destroy. Must destroy the society. The status quo. You must destroy the police. This is why they hate the police. There is anger. They want to hurt them. They want to kill them. Because they view the police. As the defense of the status quo. They can destroy the police. They can better destroy the society. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
I was thinking during the break, which I often do, on this Iran deal with the president’s doing to, but the final knife in this Islam old Nazi regime that threatens us, threatens the Arab Gulf states, making nice with China and Russia and threatening Israel and this, that and the rest. You realize that regime has not. Being able to build a nuclear weapon. During the nearly four years, three and a half years of President Trump as a result of what President Trump has done. Think about that. They’d be far on their way, if not have already secured it. But for president, Trump has done. The Democrats would not have done what President Trump has done, it’s quite obvious. And it’s very possible the Iranians would already have a nuclear weapon. I mean, I don’t know why this president comes under attack the way he does. He’s worked on this deal with Israel, the UAE and Bahrain is likely to come in and maybe one or two other Arab states. I’m gonna hold him and everybody else to the fire on this seizure of sovereignty, which I believe in quite strongly, but I think that’s going to take another term, another term as president. But Biden wants to go back. Why would you go back when the Iranians don’t have a nuclear weapon as a result of the Trump policy? So it’s the Trump policy against the Iranians that has prevented them from getting weapons. It’s the Trump policy in the Middle East that appears to be showing a growth of peace between Israel and some of its Arab neighbors. It’s the Trump policy that’s built up the United States military and seeks to secure our border. He deserves credit for these things, ladies and gentlemen. Instead, we get Obama tonight, who’s going to say he just hasn’t grown into the presidency? You know, grown into presidents like Obama. I’ll say this. He hasn’t met with care. He hasn’t met with the Muslim Brotherhood. He didn’t he didn’t whisper in. And Putin’s buddies here that had wait to live the election. None of that stuff. I’ll be back.