October 2nd, 2026

Rough transcription of Hour 1

Segment 1
Hello, America. Mark Levin. Here are our number 877-381-3811.  877-381-3811. To wifey and mother in law out there driving. Hello there. And is. I told them every time I mentioned the owners, I’m thinking of them. Mr. Producer. And so they’re out there. Drive carefully. We’re going to start with something a little different here, ladies and gentlemen. Gavin Newsom on his podcast yesterday. Yes. Here’s a podcast. He signs a bill to make companies operating before 1965 to search their records for ties to slavery. To what end, America? To what end? Can you imagine a Democrat demanding that parties. Companies, rather. Can you imagine a Democrat demanding that companies look for connections to slavery in their history if they were operating before 1965? I mean, the Democrat Party’s connection to slavery is ubiquitous. They were the Confederates. They were the Klan. They were the segregationists as well. The party of slavery wants to know what companies operating before 1965 had ties to slavery. Now. That’s pretty sick, don’t you think? Oh, it gets even sicker. But first, let’s listen to the genius who is. Gavin Newsom. Cut 15. Go. I have a bill in front of me privileged to have this opportunity. A bill in front of me that I’m starting quite literally right now. This is a bill that requires large companies that operated before 1965 to search their records for ties to slavery going back to 1849. And then we make it public. These are insurance policies on enslaved people, human beings used as collateral, quite literally, as collateral for loans. Yeah, you’re party. Hold on now. Your party did that. Fought a civil war over and over 700,000 casualties. The old number was 600,000, but with new. Yeah, I say I technology. Oh, we learned more. We learned more. Go ahead, Mr. Producer. As Brian said, starts with the truth. That’s what the two of us get into. One repair actually looks like. It starts with the truth. So the party of slavery, the Party of the Confederacy, the party of lynching, the party of the Klan wants to know what businesses. Started before 1965. Had ties to slavery. Another reason not to do business in New York. In California. Because. I think since the Civil War, since the civil rights era, things have changed rather considerably. If you’re worried about slavery, I mean, you want to look in Africa. The Islamists are doing a hell of a job slaughtering black Christians and enslaving and raping black Christians. Maybe you want to take a trip over to the Middle East where enslavement is a big deal, particularly in countries like Qatar. Qatar is a slave nation, but they don’t mention that. Or maybe they want to check out communist China, Far East Asia, where they have millions of people who are enslaved. How about that? How about North Korea? No. No. North Korea? No. Africa, No Middle East, no China and all the rest of it. Now we want to beat ourselves to death. Even though we fought a civil war and the only nation in the world to ever fight a civil war to end slavery, by the way, only one. Think about that. Think about that. Well, I did. Now, here’s my question, though. I know one corporation that operates throughout this country, in fact, throughout the world. The family that owns the New York Slimes were slave holders. Did you know that Mr. Britt is? You remember that? We spent a lot of time on this. They think we forgot. I forget nothing over at the New York Times. That’s right. Family members for slave holders. Just like in 1932 when they covered for Stalin with Walter Durant. Do you got a Pulitzer Prize for covering up a slaughter of Ukrainians? Millions of them. Oh, yes. The New York Times Times’s. Bureau chief in Berlin was a sympathizer to Hitler and the Nazis. Oh, you didn’t know that. As they covered up the Holocaust during FDR. Dirty work. I bet you didn’t know that either, if you don’t listen to this program. Multiple books are out on, including mine on Freedom of the Press. The New York Times has hated me ever since. Hated me. Then I expose them over and over and over again. The only radio host who actually takes time to learn this stuff and write about it and pass it on to you. That’s right. The New York Times. Slavery. The Holocaust. The slaughter of Ukrainians in support of. Stalin. Ushering in Castro and Cuba. That’s right. A mouthpiece for Hamas. I made some post this morning. You can check it out or do your own research. It’s a rotten, lousy corporation. That’s all it is. And here’s the piece New scam might be interested in that. Maybe hot cocoa will. From Michael Goodwin. The family that owns The New York Times were slaveholders. Do tell. It’s far worse than I thought. He says. And if these damn commercials from the New York Post would stop popping up when I’m trying to read from their website, it would be very helpful. It’s far worse than I thought. In addition to the many links between the family that owns The New York Times and the Civil Wars Confederacy. Many links. New evidence shows that members of the extended family actually own slaves. He said. I recounted last week that Bertha Levy acts the mother of Times patriarch Adolf, as Ochs supported the South and slavery. She was caught smuggling medicine to confederates in a baby carriage, and her brother Oscar, joined the rebel army. New York Slimes, all the news that’s fit to have birds crap on. I’ve since learned that according to a family history, Oscar Levee fought alongside two Mississippi cousins, meaning at least three members of this family fought for secession. New York Times. Adolf Hikes good name on Southern sympathies where reflected in the content of the Chattanooga Times, the first newspaper he owned, and then The New York Times. The latter. The Times published an editorial in 1900 saying the Democratic Party, which supported, quote, may justly insist that the evils of Negro suffrage were wantonly inflicted on them. Six years later, the slaves published a glowing profile of Confederate President Jefferson Davis on the 100th anniversary of his birth, calling him the Great Southern Leader. Now they just support Hamas and hate Israel and anybody who loves Israel. Reportedly made contributions to rebel memorials, including $1,000 to the enormous Stone Mountain Memorial in Georgia that celebrates Jefferson Davis, Robert E Lee, Stonewall Jackson. He made the donation in 1924. So his mother, who died six years earlier, could be on the founders role. Founders adding in a letter that Robert E Lee was her idol. And the years before his death in 1931, his brother George was simultaneously an officer of the New York Times Company and a leader of the New York chapter of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. See, it runs in the blood over there at the Slimes, slavery, terrorism, you name it. Although other would be bad enough given that the same family still owns the Slimes and allows it to become a leader in the movement to demonize America’s founding and rewrite history to put slavery at its core. As part of that revisionism, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson and Abraham Lincoln are suddenly beyond redemption. Their great deeds cancelled by their flaws. But shouldn’t such breathtaking self-righteousness include the responsibility to lead by example? Shouldn’t The New York Times first clean out the Confederates in its own closet? That was the question last week. It’s this. Remember, this is six years old. It’s now more urgent because of the new information. A week ago, I was aware of no evidence. Claims that any members of Bertha’s family owned slaves or participated in a slave trade. That statement is no longer accurate. I have found compelling evidence that Uncle Bertha Levy axes lit that with for several years in Natchez, Mississippi, before the Civil War. Well, they owned at least five slaves. He was your father’s brother, and his name was John Mayer because he dropped the surname Levy. According to the family tree compiled by Axel’s parents clan some 70 years ago. My clan’s a good word. Myra was a store owner and prominent leader of the small Jewish community in Natchez and during the war organized a home guard unit, cornet, a family, letters and historians. Now that the 1860 census nought separate slaves gathering lists the names of married slaves, they’re identified as two males aged 1726, three females ages 65, 45 and 23. Now that makes it likely that Meyer had slaves when niece Bertha lived with him for several years before she married Julius Axe in 1853, the owner of the Times mayor and his wife had 14 children and were affluent enough that it would have been unusual if they didn’t own slaves. According to Robert Rosen, author of The Jewish Confederates. Now Bertha, who came from Germany as a teenager, figures might have been horrified by the experience of witnessing and being served by human chattel state. She fully embraced the barbaric practice and became devoted to the peculiar institution. She was a charter member of the Daughters of the Confederacy. Chapter requested that it Confederate flag draped across her coffin, which it was when she died. Separately, there’s also compelling evidence that the brother of a Revolutionary War era ancestor of Salzberg, his branch of the family, was also involved in the slave trade. His name was Abraham Mendez Z-axis, and he was born in New York City in 1750, was an officer in the Continental Army during the war, then stayed in South Carolina, where it counts. Describe him as a slave merchant and or auctioneer. New York Times is soaked in slavery. I’m sure Gavin Newsom will be very interested. The final victims, a 2000 for a book about the slave trade by James Macmillan reprints a poem published in a Charleston newspaper in 1784 advertising An upcoming sale reads in part, Abraham six. Yes, he has for sale some Negroes males while suit full well grooms is likewise Some of their wives can make clean dirty rooms for planning too. He has a few to sell off for cash or bring them to the last few lines later. Sex? Yes. Ads, the young ones. True, if that will do. The discovery of these lurid histories gives me no pleasure, says Goodwin. The Sulzberger family is a great American family. No, they’re not. And has served our nation in war and peace since its founding. Yet cover up the Holocaust. Ochs himself turned the struggling New York Times into the gold standard of journalism. No, he didn’t. And the paper under their airs often took great risks to defend the First Amendment. Unless, of course. It was the 1940s, ladies and gentlemen, where they smothered their First Amendment. Now the standards are on the cutting room floor with every story dominated by reporters opinions. The result is a daily train wreck that bears little resemblance to the traditions of I used to be a great newspaper. And he goes on. And now their enemy, their target. Ladies and gentlemen, once again, Jews in Israel. They run a piece by Christof about how dogs, German Shepherds, among them, were trained to rape Palestinians promise dogs don’t rape human beings, but they’re stuck by. Then they came to the defense of all those journalists in Gaza who the Israelis were killing. Well, it turns out 170 of those journalists were Hamas terrorists. Oops. Or they they regurgitated and propagandized about about the casualties in Gaza, pushing the genocide drumbeat. They lied. There have been multiple corrections now, even by Hamas the other day. I haven’t seen any front page apology to anybody. That’s the newspaper. The same newspaper that spread a photo of a baby that looked like it was starving Neda right on the front page. You may all remember this. Showing you that the the damning about Jews in Israel is the IDF. And of course, Netanyahu. We’re killing babies, intentionally starving them, among other things. The baby had cystic fibrosis. He actually had medical treatment at one point, I think, by the Israelis. But I’m not sure I that’s my memory. The mother was zaftig, may I say zaftig, because very few people know that means means fat. And they were all just fine. And I can go on and on about The New York Times. The New York Times betrayed America. It has betrayed the Jews. It has betrayed the Christians. It’s got a very, very sick staff of reporters. That’s for sure. I’ll be right back.

Segment 2
I think we had a few smart Republicans up there on Capitol Hill. We have a few, but if they would act, they should put a bill in there. Harper demanding that the Democrat Party pay reparations if there’s actual evidence, not new immigrants from different parts of the world talking about people with long ties. The Democrat Party should pay reparations. I really believe this in the New York Times. Maybe we should pay reparations directly, given its family’s ties to slavery, which apparently run deep and long. I mean, it’s. It had a very significant role and it had a very significant role in covering up for Stalin, covering up for Hitler, promoting Castro, promoting Hamas. It’s a very sick corporation, very sick. We’re going to have a great life, liberty and live in tomorrow night. Steve Moore, Nathan Sayles. I hope you’ll join us for a killer monologue and Sunday for the full hour. Justice Sam Alito It doesn’t do on our interviews. You’re not going to want to miss that either. I’ll be right back.

Segment 3
When you consider the history of the New York Times Corporation, you understand its business. It’s a company from its ties to slavery. From its propaganda covering up Stalin, Stalin and his massacre. Of millions of Ukrainians. With Walter Durante. It was on Stalin’s payroll. When you consider throughout the 1940s, it downplayed the Holocaust in some ways actually covered it up. Just disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. When you consider that 1959. It promoted Fidel Castro as a big. Laura case, the Democrat who would bring democracy to the island and. Equality and so forth and so on. And look at the the genocide that followed their genocide in Ukraine, genocide and the Holocaust throughout Europe, genocide in Cuba. The New York Times was on the wrong side. And when you consider. Since October seven, 2023, The New York Times has run with lies and propaganda. To build up Hamas, to build up Palestinian terrorists of other sorts. To trash Netanyahu, to trash the Israelis, to trash our president. When you consider what they did with the. Their so-called casualty figures Hamas was putting out. That included people who are dying in natural causes and included. The actual terrorists themselves, knowing that it was a lie. Studies came out and said it was a lie. I said it was I. They didn’t flinch. They still haven’t flinched, even though Hamas itself has changed the numbers unwittingly, but nonetheless. Starvation and genocide helped spreading the worst onset of Jew hatred and anti-Semitism since the 1930s. But they like the 1930s. They covered for Stalin. They covered for Hitler. Their chief correspondent in Berlin was a Third Reich sympathizer, and they knew it. The management knew it just like they knew in 1932. About Stalin. He apologized for nothing. They correct nothing. Nothing. Now, you might say, but they’re owned by Jews. Well, the family’s mostly Lutheran right now, but it doesn’t really matter. There’s plenty of self-hating Jews. Maybe you’ve heard of Bernie Sanders. And he’s not the only one. There are entire groups of self-hating Jews. But the New York Times must be their favorite publication. If you hate America, it’s the favorite publication. The Hate Israel is the favorite publication. I think if you’re a white supremacist Klansmen, a neo-Nazi, a Marxist, an Islamist. You probably like The New York Times these days. I’m just guessing. Corporation. How does it have any reputation left? How? Well, it doesn’t. That’s why if it has subscriptions, it’s down in the gutter. No conservative even reads The New York Times anymore. They’re not worried about it. Republicans barely even read The New Yorker online. Democrats barely even read it. It’s the favorite newspaper. Of Obama and Biden and their State Department’s. Lincoln Sherman. Malley. All the disgusting reprobates. The New York Times. A lot of them are them all. The New York Times. Is the favorite. The bureaucrats. The Lakers. The favorite. Certainly is. But it’s just filled with people who hate this country, who hate our history. Just filled with people like that. How many stories they’ve done on Hassan Piker. Mr. Peters, will you Google in? I think they’ve done three. And they just kiss bad boys. But. Tucker Carlson. They kiss boys, but they want to stir the pot. Boy, they want the Republicans to lose so badly. That’ll take the lowest of the low lives. The biggest of the bigots. The highest of the haters and the promoter of phony interviews. Phony interviews. Not dismiss these people? No. Promote them. Just as they promoted. Critical race theory CRT, just as they promoted DEI, just as they promoted the 1619 project, they was full of crap and real historians said. So it didn’t matter. Any. Any port in the storm. So they’ve done three interviews with Hasan Piker three. Three. He’s that important to them. Is that important to them? Three interviews with Hasan Piker. I thought so. I thought so. What a grotesque corporation. Just grotesque. And of course, it hires. Like minded. Individuals who think the same way. Michael Goodwin, also written here. Couple of years back, while New York Times praises cancel culture but skips over its own racist history. In a recent article about Mount Rushmore, the New York Times said Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln and Roosevelt, Teddy Roosevelt. Each of these titans of American history has a complicated legacy. Told you they hate America. Reporters Brian Pitch and J.C. Fortin casually summarize the woke Herd’s litany of grievances. Washington and Jefferson owned slaves. Lincoln was reluctant and late to the issue of the Emancipation Proclamation, and Roosevelt actively sought to Christianize and uproot Native Americans. Rushmore sculptor Goodson Borgia didn’t escape unscathed. He had been involved with another project, an enormous bas relief at Stone Mountain in Georgia. The memorialized Confederate leaders, the reporters wrote. There was little in the story that was remarkable, and that was the point. The New York Times is the chief media cheerleader for the chaos unfolding across the nation routinely eviscerates American heroes, its culture and the paper’s 1619 project its very founding. Four years after it abandoned its traditional standards of fairness to try to defeat Donald Trump. The paper is now fixated on rewriting the history of America. The drive by attack on Rushmore presidents was part of its cancel culture agenda. The New York Times has never applied to its own history the standards it uses to demoralize others. If it did. Reporters there would learn that the Sulzberger family that is owned and run the paper for 125 years now 130 years has a complicated legacy of its own. And they talk about the Confederacy, slavery and so forth. Complicated history over there. It’s not that complicated when you think about what they do today. Which is awful. Ox and his descendants continue to be there in the paper since 1999, including during the enforced segregation of Jim Crow era. An example, the Chattanooga News, which owned the Chattanooga Times tenure, involves the infamous Scottsboro nine case of 1931, which involved false allegations of rape. Against a black man. Oh, yes. They get around these New York Post pop up, you know, ever. Classmates. I’d be in good shape, Mr. Producer. Anyway, he goes on about how they reported that, which was pretty lousy. Yes, it’s a very international newspaper handed down from one to the other. Yes. Long, flowery tribute. After his death, the Congressional Record of the House said the story of Mr. Adolph as ICE was the story in the New York Times. They are inseparably woven. They are largely because OX was determined to keep the paper in his family well beyond his life. He and his wife, Effie Miriam Wise, the daughter of a prominent Cincinnati rabbi regarded as the founder of the Reform Judaism, had one child, a daughter, but OX rarely hired female reporters. Oh, yeah. And there was little chance his daughter would become the next publisher. The job went to her husband, Arthur Sulzberger, and then to their son in law, Orville Dreyfus. And it goes on. What a disgusting disgrace. The paper of record. They like to call themselves Paper of record. All the news that’s fit to print. Wow. Is that true? All the news that’s fit to print the paper of record. I think that’s true, Mr. Producer. Well, its record is disgusting. It really is. We’ll be right back.

Segment 4
First hour quickly. Second, hour third. Our boy, The Phillies look horrendous. They just got rid of their man. And you may have heard of Mr. Producer quietly, Don Mattingly. Have you heard of him? Archer In Mexico. The Mexican in last place in the division or what? Say what? Am I right about that? They got a big line up. They spent a fortune for, you know, they stirred things up and they come in last. Why do you think that happened? It’s a curse. Meanwhile, the Yankees are in right now. Right. You like the Yankees? Now you don’t like the. What is it with Mets fans that hate the Yankees and vice versa? I don’t know either. Now, why would you be a Mets fan over a Yankees fan? What is that? Is it your family or something? It is family. Okay. Now, ladies and gentlemen, I’m going to read something to you. Probably should start this next hour, but let me start it now. The Atlantic. The Atlantic. Here’s who Democrats want to impeach next. As Democrats. By Matt Viser. As Democrats have grown more hopeful, they may win control of the U.S. Senate. Congressional investigators. They’ve gathered regularly in a conference room in the office of Senator Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire. She’s discussing who’s on track to lead the body’s key oversight committee if they do. The team in recent months has assembled a list of people in President Trump’s orbit and administration whose actions are worthy of a probe. A probe? You mean like a cattle probe? And they brainstormed possible witnesses, draft an information request, gamed out how the administration might respond across the hill. Representative Robert Garcia, lowlife from California who could soon chair the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, has been preparing even longer. So just so you understand, America, when it comes to affordability, Democrats are responsible for jacking up all the prices that the president has been bringing down and is wrestling down. They are not thinking about affordability. They want to destroy the Constitution because they want power forever. One party rule. I see Elon Musk picked up on a good Elon. I’m glad you listen to the program, but that’s the truth. I’ve written about their one party efforts. They’ve talked about their one party efforts starting to. Resonate out there because it’s true. Why else do they want to destroy the Constitution but to benefit themselves? But they’re not thinking about affordability. They want $8 a gallon gasoline. News.com is illustrative of what they want more illegal aliens. Medicare for All to destroy. Medicare for all. You seniors who paid for it. And all you seniors who need it and use it. Now, illegal aliens are going to be getting Medicare for All. Yeah. Yeah. They got great ideas. These dumbass. Excuse me, these Democrats. He told me. That’s Garcia told the reporter he keeps a running list of the most corrupt things that the Trump family has done. On a whiteboard in his home in Long Beach, California, where senior staffers this week wrapped up several days of strategy meetings. Long Beach, California, used to be a Republican stronghold. Now, obviously, it’s not. There’s a lot of ideas and possible investigations on there, he said. So this is where your tax money’s going with this clown. Garcia and his phalanx of staffers overpaid pensions, medical care to plot against our country. With the midterms just weeks away, an army of committee staffers have been quietly preparing to launch numerous investigations in the New Year. When the 20th congressional session begins in January. Trump and his administration could suddenly find themselves under the type of scrutiny they have thus far avoided. But there are significant risks and limits The Democrats congressional powers and divisions could quickly emerge over the number and intensity of investigations, especially if their majority is a thin one. Now, they’ll stick together on this. They’ve got their their clicking boots on and they’ve got their brownshirts on. They’ve got their. Their hammer and sickle is there already. During Trump’s first term, Democrats heavily invested in trying to impeach the president on two occasions, animating their base, but taking them away from work on issues of broader interest to more Americans. But their biggest hurdle is likely the president himself. Trump is widely expected to be more dismissive of congressional oversight than any president in history. Good. He doesn’t have to participate in his own demise. Ignoring requests, resisting subpoenas in ways that give Democrats little recourse. Reaching broad pardons to insulate those close to him. That’s what Biden did. Biden set the rules. If Democrats had attempted to hold someone in criminal contempt of Congress, the matter would be referred to the Department of Justice that Trump has controlled completely. All of these considerations leave Democrats certain that they’re going to scrutinize Trump like never before, but deeply uncertain about how it will go. I don’t think I call it retribution. I call it a reckoning, said Representative Suzanne Burnham, Golyar yabba dabba of Oregon. I don’t look at it like we’re going to get back at you. We’re going to hold you accountable. Yeah. You’re not full on anybody. You’re not fooling anybody, lady. Now I call you a lady or whatever you are. We will continue after the top of the hour. I’ll be right back.