August 8th, 2023

On Tuesday’s Mark Levin Show, the Biden crime family has laundered anywhere from $30-50 million through shell corporations from foreign countries, which is more than enough to trigger an impeachment inquiry. Joe Biden stole classified documents as a Senator and hid them in a garage, but is facing nothing like what Donald Trump is. If Trump is found guilty of the corrupt charges in the case over documents, he would die in prison which is exactly what Democrats want. Merrick Garland will not appoint a special counsel to investigate Joe Biden because they know he will be exposed and face far more jail time. This will be the time in history when it will be said that America unraveled, and the Democrat party is doing this whereas Republicans refuse to even investigate Biden while Donald Trump faces 78 charges based on documents, a Klansman act, and clown DAs in Manhattan and Atlanta. Jack Smith and Merrick Garland are being cheered on by the media because the similarity between Russian Putin state media and the Democrat media is remarkable. There is no question the Biden Administration and the DOJ are interfering in the 2024 election, but they are trying to make Trump the first political prisoner in American history. Also, for the Democrat party, science and words mean what they want them to mean, and these are the people that are fundamentally changing our way of life and our country. We are destroying energy diversity in our country and locking out millions of acres of land to shut down drilling. The Democrat party cannot succeed through fair elections and their economic system and environmental policies cannot succeed at all. Later, the bag of cocaine found in the white house last month belongs to someone in the ‘Biden family orbit’, and Joe Biden knows whose it is. Joe will play stupid to any kind of questioning if asked by the press. This is just another grotesque cover-up of the Biden crime family and they are shoving it in our face at this point.

Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP

The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.

Rough transcription of Hour 1

Segment 1
Hello, America. Mark Levin here. Our number 877-381-3811. 877-381-3811. Let’s put things in basic perspective, which you’re not going to find anywhere else. Not on talk radio, not on cable TV. And I don’t care who shows. We want to put things in plain perspective. Joe Biden and his family have been involved in bribery, extortion. Money laundering, wire fraud. Involving enemies of the country. Communist China, the prior Ukrainian corrupt administration tied with Putin. And a corrupt Romanian government. They have acquired and have laundered and have secreted through shell companies. Anywhere from 30 to $50 million. Now that is enough. To impeach this man. Certainly with an inquiry. And enough for a special counsel. He’s not even under investigation. Let alone facing any kind of charges in any court in the land. Not a single charge. He took classified documents out of the Senate skiff when he was a senator. It’s a crime. A senator, and he took classified documents in his home in Wilmington and put them in the garage. Which is what Donald Trump did as a crime is certainly a crime. Can the it’s not protected by the Presidential Records Act. It’s called the Presidential Records Act. Nothing. The phony special counsel appointed, the most milquetoast milquetoast that they could find. Donald Trump. Took documents to Mar a Lago as an ex-president. Of the two Presidential Records Act. An under federal court precedent in Washington, D.C. Judge Jackson and Obama point. He had every right not only to take them, but to decide what, if anything. He would give to the government. The National Archives, run by leftists, contacted the Department of Justice. Merrick Garland. And so we want those classified documents. Department of Justice was required to contact the White House for permission to look at the request. The White House gave permission. And they opened a criminal investigation. Because Donald Trump and his lawyers didn’t act fast enough to give them what they wanted. Regardless of whether or not Donald Trump had to give them anything. And it also raises a much more complex constitutional issue of declassification. These are not things you indict a former president over. Certainly neither candidate is running for reelection. And yet Donald Trump was indicted under the Espionage Act of 1917. The Presidential Records Act. Which went into effect in 1991. The Presidential Records Act. Wasn’t even mentioned in the first charges that were brought against Donald Trump, even though it’s the controlling law. And you have legal analysts all over TV telling you that this is the real case. And in bringing this case against Donald Trump, the prosecutors, the Biden Department of Justice purposely used a Washington, D.C. grand jury, even though that violated official Department of Justice prosecutorial guidelines, which compels. Grand jury investigation is to be done in the district. In which the events or most of the events. Are alleged to have occurred. South Florida is 1000 miles away from Washington, D.C.. And so even abuse of that process, intentionally given the makeup of the grand jury made up of Democrats. All, you need a majority of the grand jurors to agree to indict. Doesn’t have to be unanimous. All the investigative activity, the witnesses. The presentations were made in Washington, D.C. to that grand jury. Then they ship them down to South Florida. And say, okay, rubberstamp this grand jury in Florida. They rubber stamp it. And according to the. Garland, Biden, Justice Department. That’s good enough. Even though they violated their own rules. They took three years worth of video. They only wanted to give the president. Certain number of weeks, if not months, of video. The judge down there said, that’s ridiculous. You don’t get to decide what video they see and they don’t see. They wanted to try the case without President Trump, but his lawyers actually seen classified information. The judge said, that’s ridiculous. We’re not going to do that either. They wanted to try the case in December. With a handful of Trump lawyers would have to go through 1.1 million documents. Three years of videos, all the testimony and all the rest that took place in the federal grand jury in Washington, D.C.. The Department of Justice insisted that Donald Trump could get a fair trial. And at stake. Is Donald Trump’s freedom. Because if he’s found guilty of all the charges that have been presented against him, the documents case over documents, documents. He would have to serve hundreds of years in federal prison. In other words, he would die in federal prison. Over documents. Then in Washington, D.C., again, another grand jury under the same prosecutor’s. Most of these people at the senior level work for Eric Holder, the Department of Justice. They work with James Comey. They worked with Andrew Weissman. There’s nothing special about the special counsel operation other than he was appointed special counsel, which means his entire existence is aimed at Donald Trump as opposed to the usual criminal division activity. Which is exactly why Kahlon will not appoint a special counsel to investigate Joe Biden because they know Joe Biden will die in federal prison. Yes, they can hold the indictments until after he leaves the presidency. Now we come to Washington, D.C.. January six, we’re told, was an insurrection. January six commission put together by Nancy Pelosi, where she chose the Democrats and the Republicans. Two Never Trumpers. They hold a Stalinist like public show trial. No information is provided. No witnesses are provided. In defense of Donald Trump, Nothing. No evidence is provided linking Donald Trump to any of the violence that took place on that day. None. Well, what they do is. They try by implication. So Donald Trump was guilty. What happened that day because he spoke. Because he spoke. To a group of people who assembled to protest the election. He specifically told them to be peaceful. Two days before he specifically told his acting secretary of defense, the head of the Joint Chiefs, the chief of staff to the acting secretary of defense and others were in the Oval Office. To inform Capitol Hill, meaning Pelosi. And the mayor of Washington that he will make available to them 10,000 armed troops. National Guardsmen in the Army. If they’re concerned or they think they need security, they said, no, the optics would be bad. The same time the director of the FBI, effectively Chris Christie appointee because Chris Christie recommended him. Former head of the criminal division under George W Bush. Ray had on his desk a memo. The NYPD. The FBI office, one of their offices in in Virginia, had picked up word that there could be violence that day. They sent it to. Headquarters and FBI and nothing happened. It sat there. It sat there. Nothing happened. So Donald Trump, we were told, was responsible for whatever happened. And Donald Trump, we’re told, was trying to obstruct. The election of 2020. And Donald Trump, we’re told, was trying to prevent the peaceful transition of power. And so what did they do? They take the 1871 Ku Klux Klan Act. As one of their charges against Donald Trump, having taken the 1917 Espionage Act against Donald Trump and the documents case. Then on the obstruction issue, they’ve been very successful charging protesters from January six with 18 U.S.C. Section 1512. What’s that? Everybody scratch their head. What the hell’s that? Well, after the Enron scandal was over, they felt there was a gap. Congress was asked to pass a law, which they did. That would make it a felony. For corporate executives to destroy records in anticipation of Congress holding hearings. They’ve taken that law. They’ve expanded it beyond recognition and they’ve applied it to hundreds. Of January six protesters. This is the obstruction that they’ve charged them with. It’s been appealed to the circuit court. It will eventually get to the Supreme Court, but not in time. And I must tell you, I’m very concerned. We watched John Roberts. And his student. Justice Barrett. We’re now repeatedly siding with the leftists on the court. As they did today. Barrett is a massive disappointment. Conservatives fight like hell for her. Too bad she’s an Andrew Kennedy. Excuse me. Anthony Kennedy. A disaster. That for another day. You’re allowed to tell your vice president that you think he should send these decisions about electors back to the state. It’s not illegal. It’s not unconstitutional. It’s certainly not criminal. That’s not obstruction. You’re allowed to reach back to state legislatures and the Republican Party and suggest that they send a list of their own electors. It’s been done repeatedly. You hear the bobbleheads on TV regurgitate what I said, which is 1876. In 1960, that’s exactly what was done. Today, they call them fake electors. They can call them whatever they want. It doesn’t change a damn thing. That’s not a crime. The fact is that they were not certified by the archivist and they were not accepted by the vice president serving as the president of the Senate, overseeing the January six ballot electoral count. That’s the way it’s supposed to work. There’s nothing criminal about it. Nothing. And so they charged him with these felony crimes, which he can do. God knows how much more. Another 200 years, I guess. And the judge that’s overseeing the case is known to be a hack. She donated money to the Obama campaign. Two years later, he appoints her to the court. She is a radical leftist. She abuses her authority. You had three federal judges from that court, all appointed by Obama sitting in the back row last week when Donald Trump faced the magistrate at the public hearing. What it needs is a clown show. Why were they sitting in the back row? And she’s working very hard right now to write an opinion, in my view, which gives the federal government all or at least a big chunk of what they want and putting a gag rule on the former president so he cannot run for president. This provides a massive opportunity for the president. And I will explain why in a moment. We’ll be right back.

Segment 2
First of all, President Trump’s lawyer in the January six case, the fellows named Laura or something. I don’t remember you not going to Sunday and say the president may have had a technical constitutional violation and what he was telling. You know Pence, who’s number one, it’s not true. Number two, but you don’t say that sort of thing there. But it’s not true. There were no technical violations or violations of any kind. But more to the point. This is where I think my strategy. I don’t know that it’ll work or not, but something’s got to be tried. Then you seek your interlocutory appeal to the D.C. Circuit. If this lower court judge, in part, her whole silence as President Trump makes it impossible for him to run for president. You make the interlocutory appeal. That means an appeal before the trial’s over as the Senate, the circuit court, to take it up on an emergency basis where he’s likely to lose because it’s a very liberal court and then fight to get to the Supreme Court. I’ll be right back.

Segment 3
Let me just try this again. So if this judge does in part or in a whole carry out what the Biden administration wants, which says Donald Trump cannot speak. Essentially about the case. Where he has very limited latitude to speak about the case despite being a presidential candidate. And everybody else can speak about it, including all of his opponents, including Joe Biden. Cleaning every Republican. Let that dumb bastard Chris Christie. But not Trump. And what is she going to do if he violates such an order? Throw him in prison. I don’t put it past them. This is why Smith, Galan Biden want everything done in Washington, D.C.. This is why. America has never faced anything like this, nor should it. And I’m sick and tired of people saying Trump brought this on himself. No, he didn’t. No, he didn’t. Did he bring the Russia collusion on himself? Did he bring impeachment? They were talking about impeachment before he even was sworn in. Did he bring that on himself? Did he bring the first impeachment on him? Of course not. Did he bring the Mueller investigation on himself? No. Did he bring the second impeachment on himself? He was impeached. For reasons that Jack Smith hasn’t even indicted him for. This is all phony. And a hundred years from now, when this republic is dead and gone. If this keeps up. This will be the time. This will be the time when it will be said. America unravelled. And the Democrat Party is doing this. And we’re Republicans who are too stupid to understand that they are destroying the effectiveness of the Republican Party. They are destroying the Republican Party. Democrat Joe Biden is not even under investigation. He’s not even under investigation. Donald Trump is facing 78 charges, 78 charges. Based on documents. That Klansman Act. 1917 Espionage Act. And there’s clown day in Manhattan. Everybody says his activities bogus. And the clown DEA in Atlanta is getting ready with a RICO charge of some kind that’s used for the mob, RICO Espionage Act. The client act. You get my drift? So what they should do. It spent a little less time on TV. Trump’s lawyer in Washington, D.C.. I don’t know the man and a little more time thinking about what he’s going to do, depending on what this judge rules in Washington and what he should do. Even if his ruling is said to be limited in terms of what the president can say, immediately saying. In interlocutory appeal to the circuit. Now, why is the circuit a Democrat circuit? You want to know why? Because Obama and Reid, when he was the Democrat leader, the majority leader in the Senate, they added more seats to the appellate court in Washington, D.C. and then they stopped it with radical leftists. So be ready to have an emergency appeal from that to the Supreme Court. Well, there’s really only three constitutionalists. So it’s not at all clear what might happen. It’s not at all clear what might happen. But it ought to work. So I’m not predicting anything. What I am saying is. It’s the one route available. There are different ways to take this route. You could take it out of Florida and the date set for the trial. You can do it in Washington. But they need to do something. When I read something to you. And with this book, Men in Black that I wrote. It’s the first book I ever wrote. Now, Rushbo wrote a beautiful foreword to the book. This book. Try to remember that you came out in. Yeah, it’s 2000. 2004. Seems like forever ago, doesn’t it? The biggest myth about judges is that they’re somehow imbued with greater insight, wisdom and vision than the rest of us. But for some reason, God Almighty has endowed them with a superior judgment about justice and fairness. But the truth is that judges are men and women with human imperfections and frailties. Some have been brilliant, principled and moral. Others have been mentally impaired, venal and even racist. The Man in Black was written about the Supreme Court. But you can apply it to this clown, Judge Chuck Chutney or whatever the hell her name is in Washington. The Supreme Court today. And I would argue all the federal judiciary is involved in nearly every aspect of modern life, regularly vetoing the decisions of elected federal and state authorities. You know, one judge can dictate economic, cultural, criminal and security policy for the entire nation. And when I was talking about the Supreme Court. Who were these people? I’ll give you some examples. John Rutledge. Was appointed by George Washington in 1795. By recess, appointment became the nation’s second chief justice, was a US senator from Rutledge native South Carolina. He wrote that after the death of his wife, his mind was frequently so much deranged as to be, in great measure, deprived of his senses. There was considerable opposition to Rutledge’s appointment and he was voted down by the Senate. There have been rumors that his mind was unsettled and he was becoming insane. RUTLEDGE His depression was so serious that he made two failed suicide attempts, one shortly before and one soon after the Senate rejected his nomination. What about Robert Greer, opponent by James Polk in 1846? He suffered paralysis in 1867. Thereafter began a slow mental decline. Case. Greer’s case is most troubling because he was the swing vote and one of the most important cases of his era. Hepburn versus Griswald, which struck down the law allowing the federal government to print paper money. Nathan Clifford, appointed by James Buchanan in 1858, after a period of mental decline, he suffered a stroke in 1880, just before the beginning of the October term. Justice Miller described the situation bluntly. Judge Clifford reached Washington on the 8th of October, a babbling idiot. I quote, I saw him more than 3 hours after his arrival and he did not know me or anything. And there was tongue frame words. There was no sense in them. He kept his seat until his death in 1881. Sounds a lot like Joe Biden. Stephen Field Field was appointed by Lincoln in 1863, was one of the longest serving justices As Chief Justice William Rehnquist has written, the end of field service became increasingly lame and often seemed lethargic to his colleagues. During the winter of 18 9697, his condition worsened. And as questions in the courtroom indicated that he had no idea of the issues being presented by counsel. James C McReynolds was appointed by William excuse me, Woodrow Wilson in 1914. Was a notorious anti-Semite. He said he didn’t want the court plagued with another Jew. There’s no official photograph for the court for 1924 because McReynolds refused to stand next to Justice Louis Brandeis, the court’s first Jewish justice. He would leave the room whenever Brandeis would speak in conference. It’s also openly hostile toward the second Jewish justice, Benjamin Cardozo. He often had a brief for record in front of his face when Cardozo delivered an opinion from the bench on Opinion Day. Emma Reynolds, law clerk. John Knox also wrote that the justice disapproved of the fact that Knox had been polite to McReynolds, African-American servants to McReynolds as African-American servants. Harry and Mary McReynolds told him, I realize that you’re in North Easterner who has never been educated or reared in the South, but I want you to know that you are becoming much too friendly with Harry. You seem to forget that he is a Negro and you are a graduate of a Harvard Law School. And yet for days now, it has been obvious to me that you are well treating Harry and Mary like equals. This was Democrat Wilson’s appointee, McReynolds. Really a law clerk to a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States should have some feeling about this position, not wish to associate with colored servants the way you are. I do wish you would think of my wishes in the matter in your future relations with darkies. Hugo Black Black, appointed by FDR in 1937, his first appointment. But a member of the Ku Klux Klan in Alabama. He stayed on the court longer than he should have. In 1969, he suffered a stroke, resulting in partial loss of memory. His health troubles became worse in late March. March 1971, started having acute pain in his left ear and a chronic headache over his eye and in the back of his head. Aspirin didn’t help. He found a more difficult to concentrate. His short term memory was waning. You can see a lot of these guys had dementia. Found it more difficult to concentrate. He would latch onto some event of long ago and reminisce and conference. He began to stumble, badly, becoming tired and confused and unable to remember which case was being discussed. One day a book is going to be written about Biden, people who sat around him and saw the same thing. I guarantee you, Black’s mental decline seemed to lead to paranoia in the months before his resignation and death. Black was paranoid about the future, expressing fears of governmental collapse that Nixon was preparing a military coup and on and on. And I should mention that black. Um. Was was a bigot against Catholics as well. And I go through all this. Let’s talk about Abe Fortas. LBJ appointed Fortas to the court in 1965, continued to act as an advisor to Johnson while he was on the court. He supplemented his court salary 39,500 at the time by taking money from a foundation set up by a convicted stock swindler. Fortas resigned from the Supreme Court after it was revealed that while on the bench, he had pocketed a $20,000 retainer from the foundation of jailed financier Lewis Wolfson. And we can go on. The point of this is there are about a thousand federal district judges in America. They’re all human beings. Some more than others. They’re all imperfect. Some of them are sleaze balls. Some of them are dimwitted, some of them are politically corrupt in the sense that they couldn’t serve an honest minute on a court, given their biases and their activism. And some of them are the opposite of all those things. Faithful to the Constitution. The activism in the Bias. On the D.C. courts, that is the district court level especially is unconscionable. And it was intended that way by both Obama and Biden. The Democrat appointed judges are the worst in the country. And that bench is the most powerful of all the district courts in America. As is the circuit court. So the Democrats control. The D.C. courts mostly, even though there some Trump appointees, they control the circuit above those district court levels and they’re trying to do the same to the Supreme Court. This is the hell that Donald Trump finds himself in. This is the hell that Donald Trump finds himself in. And this is why when Judge Cannon, finally a judge in Florida, says. Why are you doing all this stuff with the grand jury in Washington, D.C.? Why are you still running that grand jury when the case is here in Florida? And the media don’t give a damn. Fatboy. Which one you mean? Either one. Bill Barr. Chris Christie. They don’t give a damn. They’re cheering on. Biden, the Department of Justice. And the special counsel. They care no more. About the survivability of our justice system in our electoral system. Then the Democrats, because they’ve thrown in with them. Barnes even gleefully said, Yes, yes, I will. I will testify against Trump if I’m called. And of course. Pence. Mike Pence has said the same thing. I’m not asking, but I of course I’ll be available. Executive privilege for Trump has been destroyed by the very same judge whose hearing this week the protection order. Mr. Bridges. She has a history now. Of activism, of abusing her authority, abusing power. And making extremely difficult for defendants to defend themselves. And I want to keep you to keep something mine. She used to be in the federal public defender’s office in Washington until she took a huge job with one of the Tony Democrat law firms in Washington. So she used to defend criminals. So now you see, she’s seen the light. And when it comes to Republicans, when it comes to protesters, when it comes to Trump, she has sided 100% with the Biden Justice Department. 100% and even going beyond the recommended sentences. I’ll be right back.

Segment 4
This prosecutor has been admonished by the Supreme Court in the past. It’s been admonished by several juries that have refused to go along with what he’s but he’s dealt with. But he knows in this district court judge he has an ally. I hope she surprises us. I’ll be the first to say good job, Judge. But so far, she’s destroyed hundreds of lives. Hundreds. Including the use of a bogus. Interpretation of a statute that’s highly questionable from the Enron era. Against people from. You know, January six, they weren’t even violent. We shall see. Because it really shouldn’t take long or she’s going to ditch with the Department of Justice as senator. Shouldn’t take long to issue a one or two page opinion. I also predict that if she rules for the government, she will wrap herself with the Constitution. She will wrap herself in all kinds of flimflam. That will sound very impressive, but will mean absolutely nothing. I want to thank you all. I think for the third or fourth week in a row, we were number one on Life, Liberty and Levin for the entire week in all timeslots. I want to thank all of you radio listeners. We have fantastic ratings. And, you know, it’s interesting in New York. Mine is the only show 4 to 5 nights a week. That’s either up against the Mets or the Yankees. Did you know that, Mr. Producer? Tough competition, but we do it. We’ll be right back.

August 8th, 2023

Latest

Get the Mark Levin Show App