On Thursday’s Mark Levin Show, There is a full-on assault on the American way of life. We The People believe in virtue and the civil society. Yet, historically Mark Levin has been threatened by Klansmen, neo-confederates, and radical militia-types. But, overall most Americans don’t support those radicals; they just want peace and tranquility. The truth is that one can support a wall and legal immigration without being a racist. One can support voter ID laws without being a racist. One can support law enforcement without supporting any abuses of power and not be a racist, but the media will have to think that you can’t. A distinction must be made between those that peacefully marched in Washington and the insurrectionists that broke into the Capitol building because they are not one and the same. Then, the left within the media has been inciting and normalizing violence for quite some time. In a new recording released by Project Veritas, reveals that Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey admits that Twitter is actively focused on silencing President Trump and then shifting their attention to his supporters in order to control the “divided” national conversation. Meanwhile, New York City Antifa and the Ayatollah’s Twitter account has not been tagged, flagged, or removed, despite their calls for death to America. Nor was Joe Biden suspended from Twitter for comparing two US Senators to Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels. Later, Joe Biden’s irrational big-Government speech offering a few billion dollars to be distributed amongst the people will only hurt Americans. This plan will not work once a city or state is bailed out by the democrats because they will never reform their spending. This mass distribution of wealth will ultimately result in inflation. Afterward, the violence of Antifa and Black Lives Matter must be put down. Democrats don’t mind violence if it’s for their cause. They didn’t call to defund Capitol Police that protects them, the way they called to defund the cops in major cities. The Democrat mob caused riots at Trump’s inauguration in 2017 and President Obama didn’t call in the National Guard for it. Conservatives reject all violence.
THIS IS FROM:
AP
Comparison between Capitol siege, BLM protests is denounced
Daily Wire
7 Twitter Accounts That Have Promoted Violence But Haven’t Been Banned
The Post Millennial
Proposed bill seeks to allow citizens to sue tech giants for censorship
The Federalist
McConnell’s Impeachment Blunder
The Federalist
There Is No Future For A Liz Cheney GOP
NY Times
Can Conservative Media Still Return to Business as Usual?
Epoch Times
Black Lives Matter Activist Took Part in Storming of Capitol
The podcast for this show can be streamed or downloaded from the Audio Rewind page.
Image used with permission of Getty Images / Chip Somodevilla
Rough transcript of Hour 1
Hour 1 Segment 1
Well, I, for one, am glad to see that our military. And our law enforcement, federal and local, regional and state, are getting the respect that they deserve. I very much am. I’m not hearing any talk about systemic racism or systemic brutality. Overwhelming force is being brought to Washington, D.C., because. Federal and state and local law enforcement are getting a lot of information about. Individuals who want to come to Washington, D.C., armed. And to threaten an inauguration. What’s so frustrating is we conservatives, we constitutionalists, we talk about right about the civil society, endlessly constitutional Republicanism, endlessly. This is what we believe in. And so when we’re thrown in with actual neo-Nazis and Klansmen and militia types and so forth, there’s is an enormous. Dishonesty. It’s absolutely dishonest to treat tens of millions of us this way. And I’ll tell you something that might interest you, but not the threats that I’ve received. I have not been from jihadist’s. The threats that I have received as a conservative and a constitutionalist. As an American and as a Jew. Has been from neo-Nazis and Klansmen, right, Mr. Producer. There used to be a website, what was it called, Stormfront? I believe that was their Web site. Now and in that Web site. This neo-Nazi clansman Web site. They had a photo of me. They drew on a graphic of a long nose star of David, I believe I had horns and a tail and all the rest of it. And so when the media. Try to throw somebody like me or people like you in with these low lives. It is a lie, a flat out lie. It’s disgusting. And yet it happens all the time. There’s now an Associated Press article out there. What’s the Associated Press? Is giving voice to the argument that. Comparing what took place on Capitol Hill, 24 Black Lives Matter, but particularly Black Lives Matter, is outrageous and in fact. It’s a form of racism. No, it’s not a form of racism. People want peace and tranquility. That’s what they want. People want law and order, that’s what they want. People want the Constitution complied with those of us who believe in the Constitution anyway. And the media. The media are truly corrupt and dishonest and provocative in how they cover the Trump presidency and election and how they covered this incoming presidency and the Biden family and this election. But even more than that. How they cover. You and me. They don’t even know us. It’s like two different worlds. You can support. A wall and oppose illegal immigration and not be a racist, that used to be the position of the Democrat Party 10, 15 years ago. You can oppose, man, excuse me, mail voting. As the 2005 presidential commission with Jimmy Carter and James Baker did warn that it was the most fraudulent way of voting yet. Without being a right wing kook. You can support law enforcement. You can support law enforcement. Without supporting abuses. Which now, of course, the the left supports law enforcement, but you need to be consistent about these things. It’s very, very important. And the media are not there trying to make distinctions, whether it’s Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo. Whether it’s this AP story or other stories to follow, no doubt about it, they wish to give. Justification. To one form of violence. Because who’s committing it and their claim for committing it as opposed to another form of violence, that’s not. Complying with the rule of law. That’s not honoring the Constitution, that’s not respecting human rights and individual rights. This is basic stuff. This is basic stuff. And. The Democrat Party and its conduct the last week. And the media, particularly the real hotheads in the media. They don’t seek to bring this country together. They seek to punish people. We have a full on assault against the First Amendment, we have a full on assault against free speech not covered by the First Amendment. We, the American people. From before the revolution. Are people who speak to each other, people who debate with each other. That’s who we are. I wrote an entire book on this, on freedom of the press, what’s been going on in this country. And the more corporate the press has become, the less they support diverse viewpoints. The more radical they’ve become. And the more ideological they have become of one mindset. Every bit of cable networks of which there are very few should be platformed. You had Democrats, Biden and Michelle Obama included. Who wanted the president banned from all social media and they want anybody else who puts out, quote unquote, misinformation or disinformation banned altogether. Now, I’m old enough to remember when that was. Repulsive to really all people of all political backgrounds, but not anymore. There’s a kind of totalitarianism, a kind of. Intellectual fascism, if you will. That is. Part of the Democrat Party. You’ve AOC, who’s been popularized by the media talking about some kind of commission to oversee the media and. False information that’s put out. Now, this comes from individuals and media outlets, mind you, that have been putting out false information now for years. That did not accept or recognize. The 2016 election. And in many respects, to undo it. Now, a distinction needs to be made between the hundreds of thousands of people who showed up in support of the president of the United States. And those who showed up, who tended to do harm to the Capitol building and the people inside, but that distinction is not being made. And that’s purposeful. It’s purposeful, there’s a reason why The Washington Post, The New York Times and these other outlets are monitoring every single thing any major talk show host says they want to be able to say. That you’re inciting this, that the broadcast companies tolerating that they want to eliminate conservatives from talk radio and they want to put pressure. On the boards of directors and the CEOs, the various broadcast companies, publishing companies, most of whom are liberal. So there is an tent. To purge and purify. And there’s no self policing by these media outlets. Why should they The Washington Post was going broke, they report by Baso’s basis it’s worth over 100 billion dollars and they can do and say whatever they want. The CEO of The Washington Post, his name is Fred Ryan, is the chairman of the Reagan Library. So he can say and do whatever he wants because he’ll point to the Reagan Library. The management over at The New York Times, they were bailed out, too, particularly by a billionaire from Mexico who bought a significant percentage of their stock many years ago. And so they can put out the 16 19 projected tacking 1776. I mean, this constant assault on our history, on our faith, on our belief systems, on our traditions. This is part of the progressive movement. It’s part of the progressive ideology. You can read it and rediscovering Americanism and the tyranny of progressivism. Or many other publications. Progressivism and constitutionalism do not mix intentionally so. And so when you point this out, you’ve become a target. When you dare to say, hey, look, there are 300 lawsuits brought and I’m not chasing you, no tails here, I’m talking about four states in particular that changed their laws, went around the legislatures. That was the litigation strategy at work. You bring that up. They just say you are full of misinformation and lies and you’re inciting violence. But they can go on and on about Russia collusion for four years. Free speech is under attack. And I was thinking this morning, the major channels for communication. Between and among the citizenry is controlled by the left. All the major newspapers. All the major cable channels, Barwan. All the major networks. And you can see how they have the ability to communicate with one another or with other people ideas and beliefs and so forth. Is being trampled. Under the argument of misinformation, disinformation, you’re inciting violence. We’re not inciting anything. Not anything. We’re not trashing the cops, we’re not trash in the United States military. We’re not supporting riders of any kind, regardless of what they name themselves, we’re not running boardrooms that are subsidizing organizations that believe in overthrowing the United States. We’re not saying things about other people that are inflammatory that. About white racism and systemic white racism are half the country is racist, and so you listen to this Joy read, you listen to Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski, whose programs with Al Sharpton. You listen to Cuomo, who’s a political hack, and Don Lemon. You listen to them and their guests. It is a hate fest. It is utterly dishonest. And it would be nice if, for once, The Washington Post. And The New York Times would do an analysis of those hosts. Of what they say. Of how they’re, quote unquote, inciting. But they won’t if ever they write about them, which is not often they praise them. For the most part. Because they share their ideology. Maybe they’re even social friends. I’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 2
Jack Dorsey’s the multibillionaire, the Svengali behind Twitter, and I want you to hear what he said. We want to salute Project Veritas. That is a fantastic organization. It really is. I want you to listen to what Dorsey has to say. Go should always feel free to express yourself in whatever format manifestation feels right. What would you intend to do for retros? I said in my note is going to take some time. And then the other thing, just to close out a little bit, we you know, we are focused on one account right now, but this is going to be much bigger than just one account and it’s going to go on for much longer than just this day, this week, the next few weeks. And going beyond inauguration, how do to expect that we have to be ready for that. So the focus is certainly on this account and how it ties to real world violence. But also we need to think much longer term around how these dynamics play out over time. I don’t believe this is going away any time soon. And the moves that we’re making today around you and on, for instance, one such example is a much broader approach that we should be looking at and and going deeper on. So the team has a lot of work and a lot of focus on this particular issue. But we also need to give them the space and the support to focus on the much bigger picture, because it is it is not going away that the U.S. is extremely divided. Our platform is showing that every single day and our role is to protect the integrity of that conversation and do what we can to make sure that no one is being harmed based on that. And that is the focus and that is the color we want to provide. I see. So the president’s account, the president of the United States, his account risk of further incitement to violence. Kuhnen, are we all count on hundreds of thousands of accounts have disappeared. This man has lied. He has said that basically they’re cleaning up and just, you know, making things are working properly and so forth when in fact, these are substance based. And I want to get more into this in a moment.
Hour 1 Segment 3
This guy, Jack Dorsey, is a liar. Just as. Zuckerberg is a liar. Cabot Phillips over at The Daily Wire, an excellent site, and now that we have Project Veritas. To update it, but he writes, Last week, Twitter announced President Trump’s account had been permanently suspended. Suspended, citing a risk of further incitement of violence after close review of recent tweets from the real Donald Trump account and the context around them, specifically how they’re being received and interpreted and off Twitter, we have permanently suspended the account, Twitter said in a statement issued Friday evening. Again, this is something pushed by Biden and Michelle Obama, among others. After news of the band broke, Twitter users were quick to point out the apparent hypocrisy in the platform’s decision, noting how the accounts of numerous individuals who’ve openly advocated for violence and actually committed acts of violence have remained intact, untouched. Here’s just a few. The Ayatollah Khomeini. The supreme leader of Iran has openly tweeted his desire to destroy Israel, calling it a cancerous growth that must be uprooted and destroyed. Sounds like a white supremacist, Mr. Producer. More recently, the supreme leader has implied that the United States could be sharing covid-19 vaccines abroad in order to contaminate other nations. Following the U.S. raid that killed Iranian General Soleimani, Khamenei said that Iran will never forget this and will certainly deal a reciprocal blow to the United States. And despite the fact that Canadian is oppressive, regime have banned Twitter in Iran. His account remains active for the rest of the world to see. In June of this year, Twitter responded to calls a company’s suspension, saying his tweets, quote, fall under the category of foreign policy, saber rattling on economic or military issues, unquote. This is what I mean. About situational morality and situational ethics. If you’re bashing in somebody’s brain or burning down their store. Or violently attacking cops. It’s OK if you’re Black Lives Matter and your cause is acceptable. OK. No, it’s not OK, none of it’s OK. Zabuli, Mushahid. You may not know his name, but you certainly know the organization he represents, Mushahid is a spokesman for the Taliban, an organization who’ve gone far beyond violent words, committing heinous acts of terror in the name of radical Islam, killing thousands of innocent people, including American troops and citizens. Mujahedeen Account has amassed over one hundred forty seven thousand followers, and his account appears free of any fact. Checks are warning from Twitter administrators. The page regularly touts Taliban exploits, praising the Mujahideen and celebrating raids and other violent attacks within Afghanistan. For example, one of Mojahedin recent tweets bragged about new members who joined the terrorist organization, quote, 25 soldiers, police and government officials realizing the facts and efforts of recruitment, officials resigned and joined the mujahedeen. Louis Farrakhan. Louis Farrakhan, perhaps the most famous anti-Semite in America today, still has an active Twitter account, despite routinely comparing Jews to Termite’s, among other things, Farrakhan, head of the notorious Nation of Islam, tweeted in twenty eighteen, I am not an anti-Semite. I’m anti termite. No Twitter removed the verified, quote unquote, check from his account following a tweet about, quote, the satanic Jew in the synagogue of Satan. His account still remains active and public. Wonder how they miss this, Mr. Producer. The Chinese embassy in the United States, you may not know it, but the Chinese embassy in the United States has their own verified Twitter account with over 78000 followers. Their counties routinely use to spread Chinese Communist Party propaganda on behalf of President Xi Jinping. This week, they used Twitter to defend China’s use of concentration camps in part of their ongoing genocide against the Uighurs. The minds of younger women and men who were emancipated in gender equality and reproductive health were promoted, making them no longer baby making machines, the account tweeted before saying the victims are more confident and independent. So while the tweet has since been deleted, the account remains. New York City antifa account for all their talk of restricting those promoting violence, quote unquote, Twitter still allow scientific council full access to the platform despite their, quote, by any means necessary, unquote, slogan and the use of violent rhetoric and tactics, they can’t routinely DOCSIS individuals deemed Nazis. In other words, anyone on the right shrink photos and personal information and attempt to intimidate and coerce people. The page also read posts, photos and videos of so-called fascist being attacked on the street and a protest with gleeful captions. In other words, people sitting out and having dinner. Nicolas Maduro. Nicholas Maduro, despite running his country into the ground and killing and torturing and jailing anyone who stood in his way, Nicolas Maduro, best known as the human rights abusing, socialism loving dictator of Venezuela, still enjoys the use of his Twitter account. Throughout the week, he could be seen using the platform to spread propaganda in support of his murderous regime, all while starving citizens languish in poverty. And though the United Nations has labeled Medoro one of the worst human rights abusers on Earth, with his continual crimes being well documented, his Twitter account remains untouched. Kathy Griffin, the comedian turned wannabe political activist, is now perhaps best known for a photo she posted holding a bloody replica of Donald Trump’s decapitated head, evidently pretending to hold the severed head of the president of the United States doesn’t violate Twitter’s policy on the glorification of violence, quote unquote. Griffin initially apologized for the gruesome photo shoot but eventually doubled down, posting the image on election night in November. While Twitter flagged the tweet as containing potentially sensitive content, they allowed it to stay and have taken no further action against Griffin’s account. Just seven examples, it’s just not shocking, Mr. Producer. What a fraud. This Jack Dingleberry or whatever his name is, a Twitter. What a fraud. Unbelievable. And this this exposé didn’t come from Paul Farhi at The Washington Post. Are either the Jeremy’s at The New York Times or The Washington Post, nothing. And it’s all out there, nothing. But there may be a few solutions out there. There can’t be one, these are behemoth’s. These are the richest men on the face of the earth with the biggest companies on the face of the Earth. They’ve abused. There are three. Under that rule 230, they’ve stolen your private information, they have become filthy rich using your private information, selling it, exchanging it. Mostly against your knowledge and certainly against your will. This is from the post-millennial, another new and really excellent site. If big tech continues censoring conservatives writes No David altor, that means our days on these platforms may be numbered. Republican legislators in North Dakota have proposed a bill which would potentially allow residents of the state to sue social media companies which censor legal speech, ARS Technica reports according to the bill. Social media websites with over one million users could be held liable in a civil action for damages to the person whose speech is restricted, censored or suppressed, and to any person who reasonably otherwise would have received the writing or publication, quote unquote. Companies found guilty of violating the bill would be liable for treble damages for compensatory consequential and incidental damages now. This is brilliant. What do the lefter. If they can’t get what they want at the federal level, they bring state lawsuits, there is nothing to prevent states, Republican legislatures and Republican states. Are you listening to me? There’s nothing to prevent you from writing your own laws. To bring lawsuits against these companies and they don’t all have to be over censorship, they can be antitrust cases or maybe attorneys general in these various states can bring antitrust cases or pass antitrust state antitrust laws that specifically deal with what we see taking place here. There’s nothing to prevent you from doing. Now, there is a supremacy clause so that the federal government has passed certain laws, they will claim that is the companies that that takes up all the space, but that’s not necessarily true. And so we need to do what they do. We don’t like it, but we need to become litigious. We’re private citizens have standing by state law. Where states actually have standing pass laws that allow attorneys general to bring cases against these companies. And yes, defamation cases, when you’re labeling somebody who may put something on a site that is true for but you disagree with it as misinformation or disinformation, they should be able to sue you. If you suggest somebody has somehow somehow incited violence because they they have viewpoints that you don’t agree with, I’m not talking about people who actually do, but so broadly make that claim because they they disagree with election results or something of that sort. And by the way, if that were the case, then every Democrat and every news operation in 2016, 17 in on would have been banned from Twitter. Let’s be honest. So Twitter has no standard other than to blow out conservatives. Now, when Joe Biden referred to two United States senators. Basically. As Goebbels, and that was the implication. He wasn’t banned from Twitter. He was banned from anything he didn’t even get a scarlet letter clockworks. When Jake Tapper went online to defend himself against. Criticism, good, solid, righteous criticism about his horrific and unconscionable attack. On Congressman Brian Mast, who lost both his legs in battle, in combat. How come he wasn’t suspended? How come he wasn’t suspended? Joy Reid. Joy Reid, who’s got a history of homophobia. Who’s making the most disgusting, outlandish statements in her new prime time slot on MSNBC? She’s not banned from any social sites. Why is that? Because these people are frauds. These social sites are frauds. They’re lying about what they’re doing. They support the Democrats, their employees support the Democrats. They did try in some cases, didn’t interfere in this election. And he used to be you know, when we had these big corporations, I wanted to interfere in elections, you had you had Chuck Schumer threatening the U.S. Supreme Court over Citizens United. And what is Citizens United, it allows. It allows advertisements that promote a purpose, a position rather than a specific candidate, and the Democrats have railed against this over and over again, but they don’t rail against it anymore. Because these big conglomerates and Wall Street are lined up behind them. Why am I that because they don’t believe in free markets, they don’t believe in small entrepreneurs making it big. They now want to use government to crush any competition and the Democrats control the government. And so they have the same mission pretty much. The same mission, why do you think there’s article after article in The Washington Post, a New York Times attacking conservative media where a tiny, tiny percentage. Of the media. They can’t stand the Fox News Channel. They can’t stand conservative talk radio. So day in and day out, it’s a mantra. We’ll be right back.
Hour 1 Segment 4
Don Lemon the other night went on a a rant is a very dangerous propagandist, very dangerous, and he said those who voted for Trump, you voted for somebody who was supported by the Klan, by the neo-Nazis, and on and on and on. Now we voted for somebody who was pro-Israel. Who brought peace to the Middle East? Among Arabs, Muslims and Jews in the Abrahim accords. Peace like never before, we voted for a man who got a bigger percentage of the Hispanic vote and black vote than any Republican in a half a century. A man who believes a colorblind society and equality under the law, the Criminal Reform Act. And so now you can see the media just keep going at it and Porfiry. You have an obligation as a media reporter to really start looking into this. I know it’s counterintuitive at The Washington Post. But this is going on day in and day out. And it’s thoroughly appalling. I see they have Bill Krystal’s. son-In-Law on TV now was trashing Trump earlier, I guess so Joe Biden, according to Politico, has put together with Bernie Sanders, the chairman of the Budget Committee. Think about that. A two trillion dollar package. One third of a billion dollars, more than one third of a billion out of a trillion dollars, more than one third of a trillion, 350 billion would go to the states to bail them out. And so what’s going to happen here is they’re going to help pay off their pension problem. States, the Democrats, states that need this because they’re utterly irresponsible. Now, you and I, the taxpayers who don’t live in these states, are going to be subsidizing these states. This is something they’ve always wanted and now they’re going to get. Now they’re going to get so hard working people in other states, maybe make 40, 50, 70, 80000, maybe you’re a couple that makes 120 or whatever, you’re now going to be subsidizing these other states. So this is something they’ve always wanted. Two trillion dollars. Now, the unemployment rate is what I don’t even know, most of it is what is seven and a half percent now? We don’t keep spending trillions and trillions of dollars when the unemployment rate is seven and a half a percent. We got to get off this hamster wheel. Well, there’s not going to be anything left for anybody, but you’ve heard it here first, it’s one of the only conservatives on radio who’s criticized the spending in the last several years. You’ve heard it here. First, we’re going to have massive inflation in just a matter of time. So prepare your personal finances, massive inflation, high taxes and high regulation. They’re going to choke the economy. I’ll be right back.