Today’s hearing, already … now we have the spectacle of Schiff trying to pressure the acting DNI, trying to put words in his mouth that were written by a so-called whistleblower, the latter of whom was not a direct witness to virtually anything, and who is represented by counsel who once worked for Clinton and Schumer. We will learn nothing. This is just another spectacle, another drama for the media, another sham. A hearing on hearsay — shouldn’t the so-called whistleblower be the first witness, his identity known, his complaint question and scrutinized, etc., before questioning the acting DNI about the complaint? Of course, but that wouldn’t serve the purposes of the Democrats and the media.